we will see

I had to read it like 5x to make sure I wasn’t misreading/misinterpreting what Barr was saying before I pointed it out lol

No, I posted it. I made it red, and then I waited. Now I'll just do one word.



I'm trying a different approach. I will not point out every detail in first post, because you will clearly argue anyway. I will utilize it information not highlighted to continue to dismantle dumb arguments by bad people from there.

Remember chess vs Checkers?

I'm the one playing chess

This post was edited by Jere on Dec 1 2020 03:14pm

Do you understand what that means?

He’s saying they have found no correlation between “voting irregularities” and the election results.

Aka there’s nothing to see here, move along folks

unsure if im doing this right

Proof that you don’t know anything about this election or it’s fraud

Look at you drawing conclusions from a statement that clearly says no conclusions have not been completed. How many times does law enforcement host a press conference to talk about details of an investigation before conclusions have been drawn and made official to public?

there is tons of evidence of fraud and cheating, by many experts,
2. trump has done nothing with the elections executive order yet
3. the servers seized in germany nothing has come out about that yet
so your wrong

not to mention the thousands of witnesses, some that were part of the creation of dominion voting machines
and many affidavits so to say theres not evidence of voting irregularities is nonsense, apparently u havent watched any hearings and are not watching any lawsuits

If you think that’s what he said I can conclude you positively do not understand English. Probably using predictive text and just posting whatever words it puts together for you