d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Picture Thread
Prev1361236133614361536165001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Mar 19 2020 11:20am
Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 19 2020 12:11pm)


Me on FB this morning:

Quote (Santara)
People need to learn that the price of products isn't to pay for the product already on a shelf (or gasoline in the underground tank), it's to pay to replace it on the shelf or in the tank. A lot of these products we're suddenly finding ourselves in need of have to be made by workers now working overtime to make them, have to use extended supply lines to distribute, or other reasons. And if a seller has limited supplies, are they going to sell to someone with a price fixed by law, or to someone who is willing to pay a price above that fixed price? Increased prices encourage increased production, and therefore a new price equilibrium.
Serious question: is it better to have a dozen eggs available for sale when you need them but they cost $4, or to have them priced at $2 and not on the shelf?


Quote (well-meaning liberal)
It is not better to have price gouging. It's not democratic. It's not moral. And there's no guarantee when the eggs show up the benevolent stores will lower their prices again.
It's wrong to profit off of suffering.


Quote (Santara)
then I take your answer to mean it is better to not have the eggs. Personally, I disagree. I would rather someone step up and provide me with a product I want. It is up to me to decide if the price is worth it to me. I don't think there's any difference between a product being on the shelf that is too expensive for a poor person to buy, and the product not being there at all. Where there IS a difference, is that if the product is there at the higher price, there is incentive for the producer to provide more of it. If no one buys from the gouger, then he is forced to alter his price. When stores get restocked, competition dictates that prices will normalize, whether there is a government price control or not.
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Mar 19 2020 11:23am
Quote (Santara @ Mar 19 2020 12:20pm)
Me on FB this morning:


price gauging also dissuades hoarding AND resale of products. a few posts to the local craigslist were offering TP at inflated prices with delivery until they were removed. that or the people got scared they'd get contacted by the cops.

if TP usually costs 5$, and it gets raised to 10$. people arent going to buy out the whole stock as much, they'll leave more on the shelf. and the asshat who planned to sell it at 10$ now has no profit incentive.

but yes, completely agree with the incentive to produce more. even though with scarcity being a thing that was likely already there for many products like TP and bread.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Mar 19 2020 11:32am
Quote (Santara @ 19 Mar 2020 17:33)
Totally impossible for one to take a cue from the other, isn't it? Just boggles the mind, right? Moron. Your incredulity is NMFP. You'd be incredulous if the White House issued a statement that the sky is blue, going on about "what time of day?" "Are there clouds?" "Is it raining?" Fuck off.


typical strawmanning from someone exposed for spreading and defending bigoted right-wing propaganda (yet again). pretty sure the 'moron' is the person who thinks that trying to make the 'china virus' label stick is NOT a calculated and coordinated political move.
acknowledging that an attempt to re-name a virus, in order to score political points in the middle of a global pandemic, is a shitty and cynical move, is not the same as getting upset over a harmless observation. context matters. imbecile.

Quote (Black XistenZ @ 19 Mar 2020 16:45)
You must have missed the fact that the Chinese government has started spreading the blatant lie that the virus was brought to Wuhan by American soldiers/secret agents. Trump had actually stopped calling it the Chinese virus for quite some time, and only brought back the label in response to this Chinese propaganda lie.


no, you're just missing a very important element of this: we both (and i'd assume pretty much the whole sub) already agree that the CCP is a shitty and despicable party, that is a massive detriment to its people and the world - so that's a given. YOU, however, think trump's republicans are not. actually quite the opposite... so why try to justify his actions by applying shitty CCP standards?
personally, i would NOT want the people representing my country to stoop to the level of chinese state propaganda, to rile up citizens, and to stoke racial sentiments. but hey, to each their own... i guess i shouldn't be surprised that you approve of such methods, considering your support for the german neo-nazi party...
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Mar 19 2020 11:51am
Quote (Santara @ Mar 19 2020 10:20am)
Me on FB this morning:


Well, I think going after price gougers is supposed to deter vultures from artificially increasing demand. If there were no price gougers, I agree that the new market equilibrium would be fair. Really, vendors should try and limit purchases for individuals.

This post was edited by thundercock on Mar 19 2020 11:52am
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Mar 19 2020 12:03pm
Quote (Santara @ Mar 19 2020 01:20pm)
Me on FB this morning:


Untrue. Its an evil conspiracy by rich people to keep us commoners down under their grip.

Bernie can still win.
Member
Posts: 54,187
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Mar 19 2020 12:41pm
Quote (Santara @ 19 Mar 2020 18:20)
Me on FB this morning:


your whole argument makes perfect sense during normal times, when producers can increase their production whenever there is enough monetary incentive to do so. it completely falls apart during times of crisis when production is limited not by money, but by the availability of healthy workers and preliminary materials.

Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Mar 19 2020 12:42pm
Quote (fender @ Mar 19 2020 12:32pm)
typical strawmanning from someone exposed for spreading and defending bigoted right-wing propaganda (yet again). pretty sure the 'moron' is the person who thinks that trying to make the 'china virus' label stick is NOT a calculated and coordinated political move.
acknowledging that an attempt to re-name a virus, in order to score political points in the middle of a global pandemic, is a shitty and cynical move, is not the same as getting upset over a harmless observation. context matters. imbecile.


Do you even know what a fucking strawman argument is? I didn't say "this is (inaccurately) your argument and here's why it's wrong." I made fun of you for being so predisposed to condemn absolutely anything to do with Donald J Trump that I was positive that had my imaginary scenario arose, that would have been how you reacted. Don't use logical fallacies with me, you're out of your league.

There's a reason people use simplified terms for these epidemics. The most accurate way to describe it is SARS-COV-2, but that's a technical term most lay people simply aren't going to use in regular conversation. Lay people use lay terms. Derp.

Quote (thundercock @ Mar 19 2020 12:51pm)
Well, I think going after price gougers is supposed to deter vultures from artificially increasing demand. If there were no price gougers, I agree that the new market equilibrium would be fair. Really, vendors should try and limit purchases for individuals.


You're using that Tennessee guy as a rule instead of an exception.

Quote (Black XistenZ @ Mar 19 2020 01:41pm)
your whole argument makes perfect sense during normal times, when producers can increase their production whenever there is enough monetary incentive to do so. it completely falls apart during times of crisis when production is limited not by money, but by the availability of healthy workers and preliminary materials.


I disagree. I think that in times of emergency is when price is most important.

This post was edited by Santara on Mar 19 2020 12:43pm
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Mar 19 2020 12:43pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Mar 19 2020 01:41pm)
your whole argument makes perfect sense during normal times, when producers can increase their production whenever there is enough monetary incentive to do so. it completely falls apart during times of crisis when production is limited not by money, but by the availability of healthy workers and preliminary materials.


sure. depending on the industry.

but toilet paper? lol. no. like 5 people touch the stuff from start to finish. they just turn up the VFD to speed up lines to a higher production, do longer runs, and ship more.
Member
Posts: 54,187
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Mar 19 2020 12:53pm
Quote (Santara @ 19 Mar 2020 19:42)
I disagree. I think that in times of emergency is when price is most important.


Steering production via price during times of shortage means that rich buyers and the products/services they demand are prioritized over poor people and their needs.
If there's a situation where it's impossible to produce enough TP for everyone, your approach means that the rich folks get all of it while the poor can wipe with their hands.

Quote (thesnipa @ 19 Mar 2020 19:43)
sure. depending on the industry.

but toilet paper? lol. no. like 5 people touch the stuff from start to finish. they just turn up the VFD to speed up lines to a higher production, do longer runs, and ship more.


Ok, healthy workers are probably not the bottleneck for TP production. But what if the supply chains are interrupted or overburdened and the TP factory runs out of its fiber supply? Then, we're in a situation of fundamental shortage which price hikes cant fix, so all price hikes do in this situation is enrich the producer and lead to an unfair allocation of a scarce resource.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Mar 19 2020 12:54pm
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Mar 19 2020 12:54pm
Quote (Santara @ Mar 19 2020 11:42am)

You're using that Tennessee guy as a rule instead of an exception.



It's not just him, it happened all over LA county so they could sell on Amazon (obviously there are a lot of supplies here due to population). The DA is really going after these people though because it's illegal in CA to hoard and price gouge during a state of emergency.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1361236133614361536165001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll