Quote (fender @ Oct 29 2023 04:35pm)
what i've been saying for quite a while now:
one more point: you say you don't want to make a "who was there first" argument - only to follow that up suggesting the trouble started with a completely unprovoked war against israel by arabs. it's quite convenient that your version of history completely ignores the whole ethnic cleansing, the systematic destruction of hundreds of palestinian villages, and the murdering that happened to create the "innocent victim" in the first place.
but even if i just gave you that, even if we just pretended like a completely blameless and innocent israeli state was attacked out of the blue, and then understandably and justifiably occupied territories - that occupation has to be resolved at some point.
to be clear, i generally agree that both peoples lived there for long enough to support the notion that they should find a sustainable way to co-exist. i don't agree with those that suggest that because israel was created through ethnic cleansing, all the jewish people living there today have no right to stay there. i don't think the current generations should be collectively punished for the sins of previous generations - but that goes both ways.
One of the most densely populated areas on the planet. Hamas is embedded in civilian populations, intentionally. They have infrastructure used to attack Israel built into and underneath civilian structures.
This is not a game of call of duty.
Do you think Israel does not use intelligence? Do you think the strikes are not targeted?
If so that assumes that Israel has an infinite stockpile of munitions, that they can indiscriminately bomb entire areas without specific targeting. Which is false.
If your suggesting the attacks are not targeted, would we not expect far greater numbers of casualties? 2 million people live in an 8 miles wide and 40 miles long on average. That is apparently 15,000 people per square mile.
If the attacks are as indiscriminate as some suggest, many more casualties would have been incurred.
Also your conflating two issues here. One is the long-term political peace between Israel and Palestine. The other is the undertaking of a war; A war started by Hamas' heinous attack.
Everyone can theorize and hope for a lasting peace settlement, but we have to understand that Israel's focus is removing a threat on their border and conducting a full scale war, potentially on two fronts.
Its obvious that Israel is focused on that, and not on the day after so to speak.
If Hamas had been more focused on a lasting peace, than on planning a massive terrorist attack then perhaps things would be different already.
Quote (fender @ Oct 29 2023 04:52pm)
you're literally just uncritically regurgitating ethnic cleansing propaganda. israel has the means and the know-how to eliminate terrorists all over the world with surgical precision, and they have demonstrated that countless times. to suggest that in order to eliminate some lightly armed terrorist right on their doorstep, in a small area that is completely under israel's control and surveillance, they have to slaughter thousands of women and children, to flatten a whole city and deliberately starve an already destitute population, is completely disingenuous and cruel. you're making excuses for the vengeful war crimes of an apartheid regime.
Very naive and idealistic view of the situation imo.
This post was edited by Prox1m1ty on Oct 29 2023 10:57am