Quote (InsaneBobb @ Apr 23 2021 12:08pm)
About to make dinner, so not ignoring you duff, will address it later.
Snipa, transgender does not change biology, we agree, right? That being said, women think every bit as differently as men think. We can agree that I attack a subject in a very VERY different manner than you, yes? Likewise, my wife attacks a subject very very differently than either of my sisters, which also attack subjects very differently. The generalization that they must go from point a to x to z (paraphrasing) is not correct. It's true for some. For others, it's just the facts, the logic, and to the heart of the issue, the same as "men" by your definition.
I believe what you're referring to is the fact that from a statistical standpoint, women tend to be more emotionally driven. Unfortunately, that's every bit as meaningful as the "50% of violent crime" stat. There are all too many women who're so brutally logically driven that even I think they're ruthless. I get the comedy, the problem is, utilizing a collectivist stance to prove why you're not a collectivist is not good.
I already stated that I'm angry that the media tried to utilize the case of the "Innocent Child Shot by a Racist Cop" to spawn more riots. I'm not "seeing red" based on you. Merely doing my poor best to point out that this isn't a "both sides" issue. My first post in this topic in days was today, wasn't it? It was just a rather neutral post pointing out the difference in reporting. Forget the anger, I was trying to gently point out what a shitshow the riot-mongers in the activist media have become. You've opted to poke at me, in this regards. I'm not sure why. If we agree, then let's agree. If we need to talk about "hoodrats" I think you should go argue with TiStuff. I will take you seriously, because I believe you should be taken seriously. Fair?
in terms of communication some "women" are "men". transgender in their communication. an indirect admission that predominately female characteristics are not strictly female.
and thus you've just endorsed transgenderism, thank you.
previous to this morning, and i think evident by the fact that i tried to find common ground with you when you had an adverse reaction to what was meant to be a rather benign aside, i did take your posts fairly seriously, if allowing for a fairly strict biased position on all subjects. but for a while im not going to. consider me BLM, because im going to just burn down all of your topics and leave ashes.