d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Georgia Lynching > Wtf, America?
Prev1353637383945Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 49,896
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
May 19 2020 08:25pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ May 20 2020 12:22pm)
His reference is in regards to the idea that the feller threw things off to the side when he ran away, and noticed a vehicle was following him. I can't speak to that one way or the other, just saying that's the reference.


No items were recovered, seems like people are just making things up to justify murder at this point.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
May 19 2020 08:36pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ May 19 2020 07:25pm)
No items were recovered, seems like people are just making things up to justify murder at this point.


You cannot provide proof that no items were recovered. That's a statement I want nothing to do with.

These attempts to litigate a criminal proceeding on the internet without the facts that aren't going to be released to the public prior to the trial are a level of frustrating it's hard to express.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
May 19 2020 08:46pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ 20 May 2020 04:36)
You cannot provide proof that no items were recovered. That's a statement I want nothing to do with.

These attempts to litigate a criminal proceeding on the internet without the facts that aren't going to be released to the public prior to the trial are a level of frustrating it's hard to express.


funny how that was not your reply to the posts that (without any proof) claimed that was the case. because those are claims that require evidence. not that any recovered items would justify this murder, as some of our pard racists and murder apologists seem to suggest...
Member
Posts: 49,896
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
May 19 2020 08:48pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ May 20 2020 12:36pm)
You cannot provide proof that no items were recovered. That's a statement I want nothing to do with.

These attempts to litigate a criminal proceeding on the internet without the facts that aren't going to be released to the public prior to the trial are a level of frustrating it's hard to express.


It has 100% been confirmed no items were recovered.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
May 19 2020 09:05pm
Quote (fender @ May 19 2020 07:46pm)
funny how that was not your reply to the posts that (without any proof) claimed that was the case. because those are claims that require evidence. not that any recovered items would justify this murder, as some of our pard racists and murder apologists seem to suggest...


Where did I claim in any post that items were recovered? Please quote me, directly, with post number included. I've only posted a few times in this thread, so perhaps you've mistaken who you're addressing. I'll give you a shot to recant your lies, and turn them into simple "mistakes", that's up to you.

Quote (Plaguefear @ May 19 2020 07:48pm)
It has 100% been confirmed no items were recovered.


When was that confirmed and what law enforcement or court official confirmed that? I'm open-minded, please give me the information you have that I don't. :)
Member
Posts: 49,896
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
May 19 2020 09:08pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ May 20 2020 01:05pm)
Where did I claim in any post that items were recovered? Please quote me, directly, with post number included. I've only posted a few times in this thread, so perhaps you've mistaken who you're addressing. I'll give you a shot to recant your lies, and turn them into simple "mistakes", that's up to you.



When was that confirmed and what law enforcement or court official confirmed that? I'm open-minded, please give me the information you have that I don't. :)


They have the video of him leaving the home on foot NOT CARRYING ANYTHING, a hammer is not something you can stick in your pants and run with.
The home owner also confirmed NOTHING taken.
Would be pretty hard to recover something if there was nothing.

This post was edited by Plaguefear on May 19 2020 09:09pm
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
May 19 2020 09:16pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ 20 May 2020 05:05)
Where did I claim in any post that items were recovered? Please quote me, directly, with post number included. I've only posted a few times in this thread, so perhaps you've mistaken who you're addressing. I'll give you a shot to recant your lies, and turn them into simple "mistakes", that's up to you.



When was that confirmed and what law enforcement or court official confirmed that? I'm open-minded, please give me the information you have that I don't. :)


learn to read, bob. i said it's funny that you didn't ask for evidence when our racist murder apologists claimed there were items recovered, you only wanted 'proof' for a dismissing that claim without evidence.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
May 19 2020 09:27pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ May 19 2020 08:08pm)
They have the video of him leaving the home on foot NOT CARRYING ANYTHING, a hammer is not something you can stick in your pants and run with.
The home owner also confirmed NOTHING taken.
Would be pretty hard to recover something if there was nothing.


I mean, if I take off running with my hands in the pockets of my cargo shorts, I'm trying to keep something from hitting me in the balls.

And the homeowner reported items stolen. Your entire premise there is wrong. The homeowner refused to state that it was Arbery who stole them. Why? He had no evidence. This was the entire basis of installing security cameras.

Most of your premise is simply wrong. People are following the process. And the police aren't releasing the majority of their evidence, due to the fact it's an ongoing investigation.

I'm not saying your heart's not in the wrong place. Merely that your logic is. You don't understand the legal system, or you've made up your mind prior to the legal system being able to act. Which is it?

Quote (fender @ May 19 2020 08:16pm)
learn to read, bob. i said it's funny that you didn't ask for evidence when our racist murder apologists claimed there were items recovered, you only wanted 'proof' for a dismissing that claim without evidence.


You've jumped to to conclusions. I watched the video. "Murderer" I can't even agree with. There was no gun pointed at this person. The person who died attacked, assaulted, and due to incidental firing of the weapon in question while wrestling for control of it, the person in question died. However, to claim murder? Nah. Not even. Involuntary manslaughter, MAYBE, and that based on circumstances. According to Georgia Law? I mean, quite possibly no wrong doing. And all of that because of Arbery's actions themselves. If you want to argue the case, do it from a legal standpoint. So it makes sense. And go watch the video first, so you aren't making false claims. :)

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on May 19 2020 09:32pm
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
May 19 2020 09:42pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ 20 May 2020 05:27)
blah


nice dodge on your own bias concerning which claims you demand proof for, bobby. fact is that you didn't ask the racist murder apologists for it, and that speaks for itself.
Member
Posts: 49,896
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
May 19 2020 09:46pm
Quote (InsaneBobb @ May 20 2020 01:27pm)
I mean, if I take off running with my hands in the pockets of my cargo shorts, I'm trying to keep something from hitting me in the balls.

And the homeowner reported items stolen. Your entire premise there is wrong. The homeowner refused to state that it was Arbery who stole them. Why? He had no evidence. This was the entire basis of installing security cameras.

Most of your premise is simply wrong. People are following the process. And the police aren't releasing the majority of their evidence, due to the fact it's an ongoing investigation.

I'm not saying your heart's not in the wrong place. Merely that your logic is. You don't understand the legal system, or you've made up your mind prior to the legal system being able to act. Which is it?



You've jumped to to conclusions. I watched the video. "Murderer" I can't even agree with. There was no gun pointed at this person. The person who died attacked, assaulted, and due to incidental firing of the weapon in question while wrestling for control of it, the person in question died. However, to claim murder? Nah. Not even. Involuntary manslaughter, MAYBE, and that based on circumstances. According to Georgia Law? I mean, quite possibly no wrong doing. And all of that because of Arbery's actions themselves. If you want to argue the case, do it from a legal standpoint. So it makes sense. And go watch the video first, so you aren't making false claims. :)


The home owner has stated on the day of the shooting nothing was stolen, the video of him saying this is posted in THIS thread.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1353637383945Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll