d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Forced Vaccinations For Children?
Prev1353637383947Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 285.00
Feb 26 2015 02:12pm
Quote (Valhalls_Sun @ Feb 26 2015 03:08pm)
Is force the thing that keeps you from taking others rights away from them?


Me personally? That would be morality, which comes from the ability to feel empathy and some critical self-reflection.

Question: Are there people on Earth who don't have Rights? The concept of Rights is a Western concept, and the tendency to apply that idea as a universal human idea that is written into nature is a very Western thing to do, but this universalism is an idea that has run its course and with the rise of postmodernism and a critical look at what these concepts are and how they came about (rather than thinking our own prejudices are universal law) has been very revealing.

/e sorry, incomplete sentence there.

This post was edited by Skinned on Feb 26 2015 02:14pm
Member
Posts: 52,040
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
Feb 26 2015 04:54pm
Quote (Skinned @ Feb 26 2015 01:31pm)
I don't think it has anything to do with who deserves what. We are equally fucked in the face of nature :lol:


Think of that more along the lines of "in the face of our fellow man." And that's what natural rights are; the normal expectations of behavior from our fellow civilized human beings, not animals.

Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 26 2015 02:08pm)
which is why I asked you to define it, but you never did. And I've asked you to define it on at least three other occasions


Do you need a lmgtfy for natural rights? Or can I point to the post addressed to Skinned that included it?
Member
Posts: 10,566
Joined: May 31 2013
Gold: 0.76
Feb 26 2015 05:21pm
Quote (Santara @ 26 Feb 2015 17:54)
Think of that more along the lines of "in the face of our fellow man." And that's what natural rights are; the normal expectations of behavior from our fellow civilized human beings, not animals.



Do you need a lmgtfy for natural rights? Or can I point to the post addressed to Skinned that included it?



That was what I was trying to say thank you!
Member
Posts: 9,290
Joined: Jun 29 2009
Gold: 18.00
Feb 26 2015 05:47pm
Quote (Skinned @ Feb 26 2015 03:12pm)
Me personally? That would be morality, which comes from the ability to feel empathy and some critical self-reflection.

Question: Are there people on Earth who don't have Rights? The concept of Rights is a Western concept, and the tendency to apply that idea as a universal human idea that is written into nature is a very Western thing to do, but this universalism is an idea that has run its course and with the rise of postmodernism and a critical look at what these concepts are and how they came about (rather than thinking our own prejudices are universal law) has been very revealing.

/e sorry, incomplete sentence there.


The concept of 'rights' as we define it in western world is not an empirically valid concept, it doesn't exist in terms of a redeeming claim to something(or from something), which is the way people generally conceive it.
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Feb 26 2015 07:16pm
Quote (Santara @ Feb 26 2015 04:54pm)
Think of that more along the lines of "in the face of our fellow man." And that's what natural rights are; the normal expectations of behavior from our fellow civilized human beings, not animals.



Do you need a lmgtfy for natural rights? Or can I point to the post addressed to Skinned that included it?


On what basis do you say you have an expectation to liberty? You could always be enslaved and that right would be violated, then what?
Member
Posts: 52,040
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
Feb 26 2015 07:29pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 26 2015 07:16pm)
On what basis do you say you have an expectation to liberty? You could always be enslaved and that right would be violated, then what?


The concept of natural rights grew out of a denial of the right of kings. Natural rights serves as the basis for the upholding of the individual as the pinnacle of society as opposed to the king. As a natural result, slavery is a relic of a bygone era and mankind has no expectation that they can be enslaved. Your point is moot in the face of history.
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Feb 26 2015 07:59pm
Quote (Santara @ Feb 26 2015 07:29pm)
The concept of natural rights grew out of a denial of the right of kings. Natural rights serves as the basis for the upholding of the individual as the pinnacle of society as opposed to the king. As a natural result, slavery is a relic of a bygone era and mankind has no expectation that they can be enslaved. Your point is moot in the face of history.


So then that would imply before we stopped holding slaves, the slaves of the time did not have the natural right not to be enslaved.
Member
Posts: 52,040
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
Feb 26 2015 08:18pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 26 2015 07:59pm)
So then that would imply before we stopped holding slaves, the slaves of the time did not have the natural right not to be enslaved.


Are you thinking there was a clear line to be crossed that said king's rights on this side, natural on the other? Because there isn't.
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Feb 26 2015 11:14pm
Quote (Santara @ Feb 26 2015 08:18pm)
Are you thinking there was a clear line to be crossed that said king's rights on this side, natural on the other? Because there isn't.


Quote (Santara @ Feb 26 2015 07:29pm)
The concept of natural rights grew out of a denial of the right of kings. Natural rights serves as the basis for the upholding of the individual as the pinnacle of society as opposed to the king. As a natural result, slavery is a relic of a bygone era and mankind has no expectation that they can be enslaved. Your point is moot in the face of history.


Back to my original question.... on what basis do you have an expectation to liberty? Mankind may not as a whole be enslaved, but individuals can surely be enslaved and deprived of liberty. There are many even today, although maybe not in America, that will certainly be enslaved in their lifetime. The question of slavery is not moot in the face of history because it still happens.
Member
Posts: 77,661
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 500.00
Feb 26 2015 11:37pm
Quote (Santara @ Feb 26 2015 08:29pm)
The concept of natural rights grew out of a denial of the right of kings. Natural rights serves as the basis for the upholding of the individual as the pinnacle of society as opposed to the king. As a natural result, slavery is a relic of a bygone era and mankind has no expectation that they can be enslaved. Your point is moot in the face of history.


you know human trafficking still exists right?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1353637383947Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll