d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The World Was Changed Forever > Never Forget
Prev1353637383941Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Sep 16 2010 03:54pm
Quote (sinbad2 @ Sep 16 2010 09:36pm)
I do post on them you along with many other just ignore what i have to say and that proves it.
and its super thermite nano thermite its the same thing, and yea i talk about thermite but i have no desire to take it a higher lvl.

A in person debate gives both parties a chance at a rebuttal , both sides sould beable to debate with out the constraints the of the media censorship.
I have consider the facts people present and in return.
i present my own yet mine are ignored, and i am berated for it most of the time.

being a good public speaker has nothing to do with a chance for bothside to debate the points on uncensored TV since thats where most of you get your facts.




do you honestly think they would let anythng like his work become published?
http://debunking911.com/towers.htm the print on this page only has one spot on there were welding was to be done, give the fact i have been welding most of my life shows this would have been redone or isnt a complete design of the trusses


That design holds fine. Welding is not necessary for structural integrity. In fact, with some of those bars it could be disadvantageous, considering the heat influenced zone of steel at some places in the structure, where it would partially recrystallize and thus weaken the material.

The advantage to bolting is that it's fast and cheap, plus if one bolt fails, the rest stays, if a crack appears in a weld, it enlarges fast if under strain. And there's another thing called strain hardening you might want to check into.
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Sep 16 2010 04:04pm
Quote (sinbad2 @ Sep 16 2010 04:36pm)
do you honestly think they would let anythng like his work become published?
http://debunking911.com/towers.htm the print on this page only has one spot on there were welding was to be done, give the fact i have been welding most of my life shows this would have been redone or isnt a complete design of the trusses


If it met the standards of the rest of the civil engineers, yes.

What does your welding experience have to do with the page linked?
Member
Posts: 1,421
Joined: Jun 27 2007
Gold: 43.81
Sep 16 2010 04:10pm
Quote (balrog66 @ Sep 16 2010 04:54pm)
That design holds fine. Welding is not necessary for structural integrity. In fact, with some of those bars it could be disadvantageous, considering the heat influenced zone of steel at some places in the structure, where it would partially recrystallize and thus weaken the material.

The advantage to bolting is that it's fast and cheap, plus if one bolt fails, the rest stays, if a crack appears in a weld, it enlarges fast if under strain. And there's another thing called strain hardening you might want to check into.


i understand heat can weaken metal but in this time the welding done was stick welding and stick welds get covered in slag during with welding process,
crystallized metal is oxidized metal that has been exposed to oxygen before it harderns, the flux on the weling rod melts into slag to prevent such a thing from happening,
there for weaking wont and souldnt happen.

also the buildings were made to withstand winds that high up so they were made to withstand the stress.
theres also something called tensile strength thats something thats alittle more important then just strain harding.
I know more about metals then you may think.

Quote (Santara @ Sep 16 2010 05:04pm)
If it met the standards of the rest of the civil engineers, yes.

What does your welding experience have to do with the page linked?


meaning i know what a print or design sould have on it.

This post was edited by sinbad2 on Sep 16 2010 04:12pm
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Sep 16 2010 04:14pm
Quote (sinbad2 @ Sep 16 2010 10:10pm)
i understand heat can weaken metal but in this time the welding done was stick welding and stick welds get covered in slag during with welding process,
crystallized metal is oxidized metal that has been exposed to oxygen before it harderns, the flux on the weling rod melts into slag to prevent such a thing from happening,
there for weaking wont and souldnt happen.

also the buildings were made to withstand winds that high up so they were made to withstand the stress.
theres also something called tensile strength thats something thats alittle more important then just strain harding.
I know more about metals then you may think.


< 2nd year Mech Engineering at Twente University of Technology.

And this shows you know nothing about crystallography, structural integrity, dynamics, statics or thermodynamics.

You might know a whole lot about welding, but you are far too less educated to make the assumption that those buildings were made to withstand the impact of a passenger airplane, not to mention the explosion and fires afterwards.

The picture on the website was not a technical drawing, it was just a picture to show the assembly of the trusses and columns.

This post was edited by balrog66 on Sep 16 2010 04:15pm
Member
Posts: 24,517
Joined: Dec 30 2007
Gold: 3,104.00
Sep 16 2010 04:28pm
I don't think that a construction like this could fall like it happenned the 11/9.
Member
Posts: 55,374
Joined: Mar 6 2006
Gold: 220.48
Sep 16 2010 04:31pm
Quote (jerds24 @ Sep 16 2010 06:28pm)
I don't think that a construction like this could fall like it happenned the 11/9.


Do you have references to previous events where a set of buildings of the same size and integrity were struck twice by jumbo jets and which the outcome was different? if so, please point those events out.
Member
Posts: 1,421
Joined: Jun 27 2007
Gold: 43.81
Sep 16 2010 04:33pm
Quote (balrog66 @ Sep 16 2010 05:14pm)
< 2nd year Mech Engineering at Twente University of Technology.

And this shows you know nothing about crystallography, structural integrity, dynamics, statics or thermodynamics.

You might know a whole lot about welding, but you are far too less educated to make the assumption that those buildings were made to withstand the impact of a passenger airplane, not to mention the explosion and fires afterwards.


how was i supposed to know you are a " 2nd year Mech Engineering at Twente University of Technology" ?
if thats the case why mention something like "strain hardening" which isnt as important as " tensile strength"

haveing a know how in welding means i need to know how each and every metal works,
it would all depend on what the metal is, if its cast iron or aluminum
or 2% carbon steel which is what the twin towers core colums where made out of.
which is harder then regualar steel.
all skyscrapers are made to withstand a plane impact
what exposion? from the fuel? a fuel explosion wouldnt cause that much damage with such a dirty burn.
and the fires would not have reached optimum temp to weaken the metal let alone melt any of it.

This post was edited by sinbad2 on Sep 16 2010 04:34pm
Member
Posts: 24,517
Joined: Dec 30 2007
Gold: 3,104.00
Sep 16 2010 04:35pm
Quote (jerds24 @ Sep 16 2010 05:28pm)
I don't think that a construction like this could fall like it happenned the 11/9.


Quote (Arsenic_Touch @ Sep 16 2010 05:31pm)
Do you have references to previous events where a set of buildings of the same size and integrity were struck twice by jumbo jets and which the outcome was different? if so, please point those events out.


you dont see here the words "I don't think"? It was just an opinion post.

It's really weird, the plane crashed almost on the top of the structure, it took like what 30 minutes for the building to crash. How a building like this could crash like this, it was very fluid like a demolition by explosive strategic setting, not like the upper structure crashing on the downer part and finnally all crash
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Sep 16 2010 04:37pm
Quote (jerds24 @ Sep 16 2010 05:28pm)
I don't think that a construction like this could fall like it happenned the 11/9.


You don't believe what you saw with your own eyes? It fell.
Member
Posts: 55,374
Joined: Mar 6 2006
Gold: 220.48
Sep 16 2010 04:38pm
Quote (jerds24 @ Sep 16 2010 06:35pm)
you dont see here the words "I don't think"? It was just an opinion post.

It's really weird, the plane crashed almost on the top of the structure, it took like what 30 minutes for the building to crash. How a building like this could crash like this, it was very fluid like a demolition by explosive strategic setting, not like the upper structure crashing on the downer part and finnally all crash


An opinion based on what? some conspiracy video that has been debunked so many times that it's not even worth discussing that horse anymore?

Quote (Santara @ Sep 16 2010 06:37pm)
You don't believe what you saw with your own eyes? It fell.


Nah man, it flew, not fell.

This post was edited by Arsenic_Touch on Sep 16 2010 04:38pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1353637383941Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll