I already covered this right at the start of this topic. It's already disproven and you can read the Experimental section of the original papers and perform the experiments yourself if you don't believe it.
Your view that everything is deterministic in line with antecedent events is logically sound and was widely believed up until it was disproven over 80 years ago. The fact that you stick your head in the sand about this is a you problem.
So this guy is still at it?
Do you think he googled "Swami Vivekananda" once after I mentioned he has some of the greatest commentaries/opinions on "free will" / "atheism".
I'll answer for you. He hasn't.
Like I said he's a lazy agnostic atheist who speaks in platitudes. Never studied even the origins of how his own "thinking" is "happening".
Can lead an atheist to water but can't make him THINK critically.
what say you???? You can't debate or conversate with me because you don't know the origins of the "debate on free will" and therefore the opinions you think are "genuinely yours" are not and a Buddhist monk said what your saying now and actually made SENSE of it all. You know because some people read into this stuff(Me). Some do not(you). Example of "free will" you will not look into something that would directly support your own world view/bias. You pretend you don't have a bias but you do. Having only based your opinions on Abrahamic centric world views your VIEW is skewed because you have not studied intensely the way in which you think and why that "type of thinking" arises in the first place.