Oh, the things that Tucker was agreeing with in millions of released text messages? Him personally saying that he knew that Trump's claims of massive election fraud were complete lies? Or recently admitting that he wanted to see someone he thought was "antifa" dead before he had to check himself? Or over the years railing against legal immigration because in his eyes it turns places into "shitholes?"

Dude has been carpet bombing the landscape with white nationalist and anti-worker rhetoric for years, and you ask what's some horrible things he's personally said?

Okay bud.

Any reasonable person wants violent terrorists free of any consequences (antifa) to die as soon as possible.

"Democrat" fascist location Marthas Vineyard immediately called the national guard on immigrants delivered to them - rendering the "shitole" claim true.

Anti immigration rhetoric is PRO-worker rhetoric, not "anti-worker rhetoric".

Any more "horrible things" left to fact-check and debunk, or you giving up ?

Yeah totally bro. Go blog about it on Stormfront.

go provocatively dance for minors in a bikini, child predator

Bud light sales sink 26%

Bud light was already the nations best selling beer. whoever made the call to "spread it to a wider audience" is an idiot. if it aint broke don't fix it.

The guy explained it well. They should cater for their customer base (guys that buy beer), simple as that.

corporations do this ALL THE TIME, and it's odd. they must do some really shitty calculation about the # that will leave vs the number they can acquire and pull the trigger.

but it's been happening more often with corporations making woke moves and undervaluing social media campaigned boycotts.

maybe they got tricked by past events like Chik-Fil-A, who was "boycotted" but never missed a beat. Right winged boycotts seem far more successful lately than Left winged boycotts. just from a cursory view.

hogwarts legacy, chick fil a, Goya, etc. all were failed attempts to amplify outrage that ultimately failed.

i think the reason is fairly clear, at least to me. left wingers try to boycott on behalf of a minority group, whereas right wingers boycott from a majority collective. the difference being convincing others to boycott on behalf of someone they might not even know, vs boycott on behalf of yourself.

white's stopped buying goya beans, and hispanics didn't. white purple hairs didnt buy hogwarts, everyone else did. but rednecks stop buying bud light, which has MANY alternatives, and it's actually effective.

bud light should have come out with a seltzer that calls itself a beer, at least that would have been funny, bud light trans orange-mango.

new fox news

Again, the premise is that Ukraine was on the verge of NATO membership, but it's simply not true. Even if it was true, it wouldn't justify Russia's genocidal war. But it's not true. So we're discussing an issue where you are accepting Russian propaganda as gospel, and ignoring the actual facts. You're also ignoring the actual justifications for the war against Ukraine from Russia. They don't talk much about Ukraine joining NATO... they talk about a bunch of other absurd things to justify the war. If you are going to defend Russia's genocidal invasion, how about you defend the justifications they themselves use? Defend what the popular tv shows in Russia are saying about the invasion. Because that's what Russians are hearing every day.

This post was edited by IceMage on May 7 2023 04:19am