speaking of completely lying about an attack....

in 2004, the left claimed there were no WMDs found in iraq. later they told us that the handmade crockpot bombs used in the boston bombing in 213 were WMDs. so all that shiit about Iraq not having WMDs, total lie as it turns out.

https://swampland.time.com/2013/04/22/dont-panic-if-the-boston-bomber-is-charged-with-wmd-use/

The Justice Department charged the accused Boston bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev in federal court Monday, making him a criminal defendant and not an enemy combatant. Among the charges contained in the Justice Department’s affidavit: use of a weapon of mass destruction.

Did the Boston bombers really use WMD? Legally, yes. That might sound surprising — but don’t be alarmed. The Tsarnaev brothers didn’t release anthrax in the Boston subway or tuck a dirty bomb outside Fenway Park. It turns out that federal law defines “weapon of mass destruction” in extremely broad terms. The relevant statutes define almost any significant explosive device as a WMD. That specifically includes bombs, grenades, mines, and small rockets and missiles. The pressure-cooker bombs planted at the Boston marathon and the explosives hurled at police on Thursday night would almost certainly qualify.

experience spamming twitter maybe kekw

Fascism is an ultranationalist, authoritarian ideology which emphasizes the subordination of corporate and individual power under the auspices of a powerful centralized state.

The American left is both racist and authoritarian, and they certainly believe in weaponizing corporate power to push ideological / state interests. The difference is in outlook. Fascism is nationalistic, the state exists as the physical embodiment of a nation's will. The left is globalist in the extreme, with the entire world variously divided into oppressor / oppressed categories.

wrong. fascism and communism are both dictatorships. they both subordinate corporate and individual power under a powerful centralized state. the distinction is that fascism divides by race and communism divides by class.o

This post was edited by Kuggergug on Oct 26 2022 11:37am

LOL you dont know what communism is.

ask marx

Do you? your definition of fascism is incorrect, and of communism is tangential at best
Sure, classical marxism divided by class in an effort to push their ideology, but their goal was about who gets to own things (only the state) and make the rules.
Neo-marxism is using race division to try the same thing again.

Are you hoping for another round of 100 million holes in the ground? That's what happened last time.

This post was edited by EaterOfSound on Oct 26 2022 11:49am