Quote (zarkadon @ 4 Apr 2019 17:58)
Another country failing to deport fugitives, assuming that another state's court isn't doing their job properly, which is the kind of assumption that should have no place in the EU, be it Sweden or Bulgaria. A country with a flawed justice system shouldn't be part of the EU... we either get rid of those that we believe are twisting the judiciary system, or we assume they follow the right procedures. Anything else just weakens the union.
Are the foster parents non-swedish citizens? What's the objective reasoning to declare the household foreign? Note the word objective... we need something legally tangible that can draw the line, so as to not leave this and other cases open to the subjective interpretation of judges.
Note that I have no particular opinion in this case due to the lack of information, but I do believe in 'in dubio, pro reo'... so the burden of providing objective evidence rests upon those accusing the Swedish court of violating EU regulations.
first of all, children shouldnt be taken away from their parents just because of unemployment.
second, children from a christian household should generally not be placed in a household of a different religion. no matter if its muslims, jews, buddists or adherents of the flying spaghetti monster.
third, if the parents whose kids are to be taken away did not commit violent crimes to justify putting the kids in foster care, then those parents should get at least some say over the environment where their kids will be placed.
fourth, I understand international arrest warrants in cases where one parent is trying to abduct his/her children from the other parent. but in a case where a father who hasnt committed
any crimes by the looks of it is taking his children away from foster parents, it is grossly inordinate to put them on a "most wanted" list. unemployment surely does not erase the legitimacy of a father/mother.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Apr 4 2019 03:51pm