Quote (Black XistenZ @ Feb 5 2021 03:48pm)
Why do you refer to Rubio as a populist? Maybe I'm wrong, but to the best of my knowledge, he hasnt really been a populist for most of his career. He started out as a child of the tea party wave, flirted with Romney/Ryan-esque fiscal conservatism for a bit, but then just was an ideologically amorphous candidate during the 2016 primary. His rationale was "I can be whatever you want me to be, but anyway, I'm young, slick, latino and appealing to the beltway press". He was almost comically out of his depth. Since 2016, he has basically tried to pander to the Trump crowd whenever his views happened to align with Trump's, and tried to emulate his tone. Policy-wise, he staked out some pretty hawkish foreign policy views, but otherwise largely remained a blank slate.
Hawley imho had a much more well-defined pitch, he was very clearly positioning himself as the thought-leader of a new, right-wing populist direction of the GOP. His calculus very clearly was that he would be the answer to the question of how "Trumpism without Trump" could look like. By contrast, I still have no fucking idea what Rubio's calculus is, or will be in 2022/2024.
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=82056321&f=119&o=0Robotic Rubio came out in late 2019 with his new version... appealing to the right-wing populist crowd. Obviously I recognize the discrepancy between his old views and current views because in this thread I called him the populist pretender. He's an empty suit who will do whatever he needs to in order to succeed politically.
I think Hawley is taking the most obvious route to the presidency... going on Fox News every night, railing against liberal corporations and Big Tech, while in practice doing basically nothing to move the ball forward for his constituents. If Hawley is the thought leader I have bad news about your movement.
As an aside, I believe Ted Cruz will be the Republican nominee in 2024, unless Trump makes a real effort at it.
This post was edited by IceMage on Feb 5 2021 04:46pm