d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Christianity Is Obviously Fake
Prev1347348349
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 16,389
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jul 23 2026 03:05pm
I'm still waiting for you to explain what you mean by fake. What does it mean for Christianity to be fake?

"Christianity being fake means _____________"

Please fill in the blank.


Christianity being fake means... its not based in reality. Aka magic, dragons, cherubim, leviathans, heaven hell etc.
These are fairytale creatures you would find in a fiction section of a library....

Do we reclassify all fiction as possibly true because we don't know 100% if they don't exist? Rediculous.



https://imgur.com/LzRFVYW.jpeg

This is a strawman. Quite a ridiculous one at that.

You know that for the most part they aren't proud of ignoring evidence, they think they have evidence. You are intentionally misrepresenting their views to make them easier to attack.

Why not just contend with their actual positions rather than share these moronic memes?


They don't ignore evidence lol? What do you think christian apologetics do all day? They ignore anything from evolution to cosmology which goes against their narrative. You cannot squeeze proof out of them because they have none

Here watch them ignore this.


Evidence of the crime, a crime that is labeled and considered evil by the courts. It is not a crime because of our society preferences it is a crime because of what it is and you refuse to call it what it is.

This has nothing to do with preference.

You are still tip toeing around this concept and it's very concerning why you avoid this subject.


What makes anything a crime? How did the courts decided what should be a crime in a first place? We have new laws being passed and old ones changed every day why do you think that is?

This post was edited by addone on Jul 23 2026 03:23pm
Member
Posts: 19,269
Joined: Nov 12 2005
Gold: 30.70
Jul 23 2026 03:21pm
Christianity being fake its not based in reality. Aka magic, dragons, cherubim, leviathans, heaven hell etc.
These are fairytale creatures you would find in a fiction section of a library....

Do we declassify all fiction as possibly true because we don't know 100% if they don't exist? Rediculous.





They don't ignore evidence lol? What do you think christian apologetics do all day? They ignore anything from evolution to cosmology which goes against their narrative. You cannot squeeze proof out of them because they have none

Here watch them ignore this.
https://imgur.com/6GwQjUx.jpeg


11 You may eat any clean bird. 12 But these you may not eat: the eagle, the vulture, the black vulture, 13 the red kite, the black kite, any kind of falcon, 14 any kind of raven, 15 the horned owl, the screech owl, the gull, any kind of hawk, 16 the little owl, the great owl, the white owl, 17 the desert owl, the osprey, the cormorant, 18 the stork, any kind of heron, the hoopoe and the bat.

In ancient Hebrew, the word used to categorize these animals is 'owph, which translates generally to "winged or flying creatures" rather than the modern scientific definition of a "bird."

Facebook memes continue to fail, bit you typically resort to more memes when you've decided to ignore all the points you can't argue against.
Member
Posts: 16,389
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jul 23 2026 03:54pm
11 You may eat any clean bird. 12 But these you may not eat: the eagle, the vulture, the black vulture, 13 the red kite, the black kite, any kind of falcon, 14 any kind of raven, 15 the horned owl, the screech owl, the gull, any kind of hawk, 16 the little owl, the great owl, the white owl, 17 the desert owl, the osprey, the cormorant, 18 the stork, any kind of heron, the hoopoe and the bat.

In ancient Hebrew, the word used to categorize these animals is 'owph, which translates generally to "winged or flying creatures" rather than the modern scientific definition of a "bird."

Facebook memes continue to fail, bit you typically resort to more memes when you've decided to ignore all the points you can't argue against.


In Deuteronomy 14:11 the bible uses word ṣip·pō·wr (צִפּ֥וֹר) NOT "owph" which clearly means birds not bats. You are using a different word from a different passage Fail try again
Member
Posts: 19,269
Joined: Nov 12 2005
Gold: 30.70
Jul 23 2026 06:48pm
In Deuteronomy 14:11 the bible uses word ṣip·pō·wr (צִפּ֥וֹר) NOT "owph" which clearly means birds not bats. You are using a different word from a different passage Fail try again


You're right, verse 11 references that word, but we weren't talking about just verse 11. Your incorrect meme referenced 11 through 18. Why would you post a bat about verses 11 THROUGH 18 and then try to correct me on just the first verse?

What about the verses that discuss owph or tsippor?

Your lack of understanding is unbearable. Taking verses out of context will continue to demonstrate failure from your end. God remains true yesterday, today and forever and people like you continue to strengthen the gospel.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1347348349
Add Reply New Topic New Poll