Quote (Surfpunk @ 18 Oct 2022 18:28)
You'll note that I never said crime wasn't increasing. But far more people die every year due to air pollution than from violent crime, but you rarely see news reports about that. Same thing with wage theft, even though more money is stolen from workers through wage theft than is stolen by all forms of property crimes combined. Same crickets from the media. At the end of the day, there are far greater risks to human life and property, yet there's no focus on that because the remedies for those don't involve proposals to increase police budgets.
Is it actually true that more people die from air pollution than from violent crime in the US? This is obviously true in places like India or China, but in the US?
The general problem with these types of threats is that they are very unevenly distributed. Someone with a normal or even good job will not feel threatened all that much by other people experiencing wage theft, but he will feel threatened if there was a deadly stabbing in the subway station he uses every morning. Same story with rape: yes, a woman getting beaten down and dragged behind a bush by a stranger is more rare than women getting raped by their own husband, but the former is a threat to all women while the latter is not for the vast majority of women who have a non-violent spouse that they can trust.
My point is that it is actually
rational for threat perception to not be fully proportional to crime incidences.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Oct 18 2022 10:59am