yeah she was hailed as the most qualified candidate of all the times by Pres Obama - of course a racist adolf-loving anti-semitic sloth like fender (aka heinrich von goebbels) would deny this

This post was edited by excellence on Dec 19 2019 05:55am

_____________________________________________________________



nice dodge on the voter purges. also, if hillary was the best, why did she have to cheat in order to beat bernie in the primary then? you people spent years obsessing over how flawed she was, and now that it doesn't fit your narrative, you suddenly agree with obama's endorsement?

your post is so garbage, the fact that you don't even know the difference between 'there' and 'their' is probably the least disturbing part about it - and it's still fucking embarrassing...

Nice tirade, but it was the media and dnc and Obama who claimed her to be the best canidate. Also thanks for confirming you're a racist: "you people". The fact that you had to grab onto a typo. Where I've used the words correctly a million times in this forum just proves your post to be garbage.

This post was edited by Landmine on Dec 19 2019 07:08am

i'm neither 'the media' nor obama, and i think she was a terrible candidate with massive flaws, who only got the nomination by cheating. you people have been shitting on her for years, so stop pretending she wasn't terrible, just because she beat trump by several millions in the popular vote. can't have your cake and eat it...

concerning your moronic allegations, i'm pretty sure 'right winger' is not a race - you're just being a massive snowflake. don't you people always complain that 'the left' calls everything 'racist', and that the word has lost its meaning? just typical trump cult hypocrisy i guess...

btw, you should look up what 'typo' means. confusing 'their' and 'there' is stupidity, not a typographical error - just like repeatedly misspelling 'candidate'. but i guess that's also just a 'typo', and not more evidence of you being a bit simple...

So you repeated yourself and spewed garbage. Also I'm typing on a phone atm. So hold onto whatever you can as your garbage argument falls to pieces.

how is 'typing on the phone' connected to you repeatedly misspelling a word exactly the same way? your excuses are as shitty, transparent, and spineless as your cult leader's...

nothing in your posts addresses the fact that the 'just beat him at the ballot box' talking point, in order to delegitimise trump's impeachment, is rather idiotic, considering he was already beaten by a terrible democratic candidate, and more importantly, that republicans are doing their best to outright RIG the elections (not securing them sufficiently against foreign meddling, massive voter purges, ridiculous gerrymandering, coordinated disenfranchisement of minority voters, citizenship question on census, voter id laws...) in their favour because they know they can't win based on policy and substance...

This post was edited by fender on Dec 19 2019 09:02am

Now it's misspellings and not grammatical errors? Another garbbage post by someone who thinks his opinion is more valid than actual events taking place during an election, but I wouldn't expect anything more from an authoritarian that holds racists views.

i think it would be more accurate to say they aren't sure if they can win a straight up election with several states looking more purple in 2020 than 2016, also not sure how the 2016 trump voters are feeling in 2020 with respect to the lack or campaign promises (jobs returning mainly) will effect the last elections results in rust belt states. so they're "rigging" as insurance for the unknown.

i would still say projections lean more towards a 2020 win for Trump without them doing anything to rig the election. but we've come to doubt projections and polls as a default. so they're doing their best to gain an edge in what will surely be a contentious campaign moving forward.

If he was "beaten", then why is he president?
Both campaigns knew that it was about maximizing their result in the electoral college, not the popular vote. The Clniton campaign failed to win in the one metric that mattered.

Furthermore, a campaign for the popular vote would have played out differently from the campaign we actually saw in 2016. It's a very short-sighted concept to just take the popular vote outcome from a different campaign (one fought for the EC) and just postulate that this is also the outcome a campaign for the popular vote would have produced.




How exactly is a citizenship question on the census supposed to affect the outcome of an election in which only citizens can cast a vote to begin with?
Also, how dare Republicans demand voters to be able to prove their identity before being allowed to vote? Outrageous!!111




This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Dec 19 2019 11:30am