If you say resurrection happened you need to prove resurrection. If you cannot prove that very specific resurrection you need to cite other independent resurrection that can be verified through independent accounts. Or better yet demonstrate a resurrection in real time in front of live audience and a medical practitioner that can measure your vitals. For example if we chop your head off and confirm you are medically dead for at least 24 hrs. Then if you return back to life open your eyes reattach your head and function normally. That would be demonstrating resurrection is possible. Because you are asking to accept a magical event without a basis in reality. It hard enough to accept jesus existed as a regular man but you want us to accept he was also a magical being who could raise people from the dead and fought with death in hades lol.

If you claim there is a place called Hades we are going to need video proof or some other measurable way to verify it other than trust me bro. If you claim Narnia is in the back of a wardrobe closet we should be able to visit it ourselves.
I have no way of knowing what you are saying other than your word. (Which means very little).

This post was edited by addone on Jul 22 2026 02:25am

you failed to justify logical induction within your own worldview

"To prove reality you need to demonstrate it physically "is this true? if so prove it physically

This post was edited by majorblood on Jul 22 2026 02:55am

Ok punch yourself in the face. Let me know if your fist was real or theoretical fantasy. I would demonstrate it in person but you going to have to improvise.

"To prove reality you need to demonstrate it physically "is this true? if so prove it physically

you need to prove this

I am giving you proof you are not following my instructions. Reread post #3443

That is my proof of physical reality physically demonstrated.

Don't come back when you completed the assignment.

how does that prove "To prove reality you need to demonstrate it physically"
you realize this is an exclusive statement, right? how is that statement proven physically?

how do you know sensory data is reliable?

This post was edited by majorblood on Jul 22 2026 04:23am

You asked how can we prove things physically. I gave you simple and clear instructions.

Come back when you've done so.

you made the exclusive statement "to prove reality you need to demonstrate it physically"

are you now backing off and saying it is not an exclusive statement?

You had a full day to respond and I came back to that? Pitiful. If you want to show that Christianity is fake then you would be able to answer to almost anything that is taken from the Bible. The fact that you did not even attempt to answer shows the Bible still holds true over your opinion.

Why can't you push back on anything? You have only shown that you don't have an answer and you don't have a viable alternative. You wonder why we have been going in circles? It's because you can't get past level 1.

Shall we go back to the basics of the concept of sin?

Why aren't you following the instructions and yapping something about exclusive statements? Its not that deep you are overthinking this.
You clearly have a hard time grasping physical reality. People spend way too much time burying their face in a book they forget what phyical reality feel like.

Less talky more punchy