so you explain the greenhouse gas effect by not at all referencing it?

you're just showing a pattern carried out over hundreds of thousands of years. that does nothing to explain why it's raising so fast above the trend of the pattern in a close up scope, nor how greenhouse gases are contributing. and as Lance said it completely ignores the pollutant aspect to air quality.

so thanks for confirming all you can do is dip your toe in because you're afraid to swim with the sharks. makes sense given that you're always bleeding between the legs.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Dec 3 2019 10:26am

The LIGHT green on the graph is greenhouse gases, the dark green is temps.

/e Ya know, that in the mornings... you're getting to be a real waste of e-ink? ^^

This post was edited by Ghot on Dec 3 2019 10:29am

so what does the graph say about air pollutants? what does it say about the rate of temperature increase that follows the natural cycle? are we on that pace? above it? does air pollution clean itself up? did previous temperature fluctuations in the human era cause issues? are those issues we should try to alleviate or prevent?

nah. let's just post memes and graphs about how it's all mother nature's fault. and while we're at it stop providing hurricane, earthquake, and tornado relief because it's mother nature's fault. sue her.

keep your suit dry old man.

you're just interested in placing blame, not who or what will be affected. if its a natural cycle i have no investment in climate change, but i'd like to prevent issues be they natural or manmade.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Dec 3 2019 10:34am

Look at the graph... it's a cycle. A cycle that's been around, a lot longer than we have, which IS the important part of the graph. Look at the peaks and troughs and WHEN they happened.

You are NOT triggering me or getting me mad. I'm assuming here that you might just be too dense to SEE the obvious answers in front of your face. I hope that's not the case.

so basically you cant read.

i posted a few questions aimed at finding if we're on a natural cycle. then a few that apply in either case (natural or manmade).

i see you're scared of these questions.

if you have to tell someone you're not triggered you are triggered.

but feel free to at least give those questions your best effort.

Looks like a natural cycle to me. about every 100,000 years or so. Just like predicted. It also coincides with the major magnetic pole reversal, which started about 120 years ago...in our time.








Can't make it much simpler bro. :/

Sure you do.

so u still can't read? or is it that you can't think?

feel free to ignore the hard questions about if we're above or below the increase in annual temperature that comes with a natural cycle.

or just keep dodging anything that takes more than a million year graph.

We don’t even have an air conditioner

Sure you don't.