Per rittenhouses's attorney:

Mock juries showed a huge improvement in outcomes between putting Kyle on the stand vs not. It wasn't even close. And in wisconsin in particular, it plays very poorly to not put a defendant on the stand.
So they recognized the risks, but that it was a huge upside

Your so smart.

Maybe if this was still 1968.

In 2021, there'd never be a trail. CNN would run hourly articles about how white supremacists attacked a black man and he heroically defended himself.

Still no valid points, like I said you are an actually dumb individual and not worth my time.

Facts according to who? Your news outlet of choice? You also must not understand that you do not possess the necessary credentials to determine the competency of this judge rofl. Stfu now

I remember watching this and thinking it was the worst decision the defense made.
Turns out it was a 5head move. As he said, if you don't put the defendant on the stand in Wisconsin, you lose.

No, if was 1968 would only need a tree and a rope. No need to waste the courts time.

Ez gg no re noob

I can do this in my sleep, too easy.

let me get that straight, you think rittenhouse went to kenosha to murder a child rapist? of all the dumb takes i've seen on this, yours might just take the cake, lol.

nah, he went there to seek a confrontation, roleplaying a LEO, and ideally shoot some people he disagrees with politically. and that's what he did, that's why he's your hero. could have been a 17 year old girl who never did anything wrong in her life, could have been an 80 year old church goer, could have been a black kid just walking through the streets, could have been a 9-year old child that just happens to be muslim. their murderers are your heroes...

Do what? Copy what others say because you are inept to form your own thoughts? Dude literally read your recent posts, you legit look like a complete doofus. Ez gg no re I’m done with this noob