OK, once again for the short bus...

The ONLY reason that this hearsay we've been seeing is "admissible" is because this is not an actual court case. In any court case it would be thrown out.
But keep equivocating, it makes you look smart.

widow 0.5 maybe.

all of the engagement, none of the IQ or consistency.

Dick was a nice guy at heart. u could have a joking back and forth. Ghot just tries to crack himself up while staying in one place in the conversation as well as an electron.




"the only reason this Taco pizza technically is acceptable is because we're at pizza hut and not taco bell. this is NOT a taco."

thanks for the info grandpa. very informative.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Nov 21 2019 10:16am

...and right back to the ad hom.

that's not an adhom. an adhom (because even after posting the definition you still are confused) is when you ONLY insult, without arguing against the position made. whereas i did both.

adhom =/= insulting

adhom = insulting with no argument

do you get it now grandpa? or do u need an analogy from the 60s to understand literally everything?

kek