Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 28 2021 03:08pm)
It's still fundamentally wrong to claim, like snipa did in his post to which I was replying, that Obama was "blockaded before he ever took office". I might have been wrong on the duration of time for which Obama had a filibuster-proof majority, but he was still in the strongest position to pass legislation in decades.
1.: he did have the opportunity to pass a piece of legislation which couldnt be filibustered. To the best of my knowledge, this was the only such time window in decades. Reagan, Bush, Clinton, W. Bush, Trump, Biden - they all didnt get this opportunity.
2.: even without a filibuster-proof majority, Obama was very close for most of those first two years in office. He only needed to win over 1 or 2 GOP senators to get past the filibuster.
3.: he had the strongest mandate of any president over the past 25 years and very good approval ratings at the start of his presidency.
Having a filibuster-proof trifecta is a historical anomaly, not the normal standard by which we should compare presidents. Compared to historical standards, Obama was in an unusually strong position to get things done, far stronger than what his predecessors and successors had at their disposal. What he got done with it was an insufficient stimulus bill which led to one of the most sluggish economic recoveries on record, a shitty healthcare bill which inflamed his opposition and left his supporters unsatisfied, and a regulatory bill for the financial sector which was overly complicated and effectively strengthened the market position of Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan etc. against their smaller competitors.
AHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA
u took the "blockaded before he took office" statement 100% literally? jesus man. i was being hyperbolic to underline my position that racism was against him. as in "people were against him before he got elected because he was black", not "he didnt have a mandate for a few months of potential legislation". and my point stands anyways, despite having a mandate Obamacare was insanely hard to get into law because of a combination of special interests being against it and propaganda from the right wing.
the truth is Obamacare was decent before the insurance companies got ahold of it. and we can criticize Obama for letting that happen, but reality is if he didnt it likely wouldnt have gotten passed at all. Obamacare was always a stepping stone, its the only way it works in the US. shitty progress leads to better progress. the fact that you hold this exclusively against Obama simply because his signature was on the bill is beyond silly. blaming a president for the state of incremental change in the US which predates him by a century or more. its hard coded into our system lol.