There are more than a few problems with this false equivalency.

1. Fred Perry shirts have a very long history of use by people and groups who are not white supremacists, including explicit reasons given by PB themselves.
2. PB have many nonwhite members and do not advocate white supremacy.
3. Some white supremacists/nazis might be skinheads, but that doesn't mean everyone who shaves their head for the rest of human history is a nazi.



Explicit denial of white supremacy and a detailed analysis of the history of fred perry shirts made by the founder of the Proud Boys is somehow disqualifying in your opinion, rather than a pertinent rebuttal.

Interesting

You are deflecting again..
1 post.. and you cannot stay the course.
Its not false equivalency I haven't even gotten to that part... I also SPECIFICALLY posted that not ALL people who wear FP shirt etc. were racist.. blah blah blah.
and OF COURSE the guy talking about himself is going to openly deny being racist.. You think he wants that rap? LOL give me a break. And its not a complete history, its a convenient one that fits a narrative that directly benefits himself.
this is your argument? Like I said.. its a complete waste of time..
bye troll.

30% of proud boys are black. You have to have serious down syndrome to believe all of the VOX headlines about proud boys being racist.

Hey stick to bombing china as a good idea..

I'm not deflecting.
I'm explicitly attacking your line of argument and making valid points that destroy your position.

Explicit denial is not proof of guilt.
A video of someone defending himself is not disqualifying.
You have no evidence to back up your smears.

Claiming this is "deflection", therefore a waste of time, and running away instead of providing evidence for your claims and defending your arguments just tells us you have no intellectual integrity.

So if I had HRC defend her position on the Emails and denied it via a YouTube statement, that would be considered proof in your mind?
like wtf.. LOL
I've already posted a ton of stuff, that you just deny.. are you a member? too much trolling for me.. Sorry

No, I am not claiming just any defense of oneself is necessarily proof.
Nor am i asking you to blindly believe what he said.

However, I would not dismiss someone on the basis of defending themselves or dismiss someone who is citing people with first hand knowledge defending themselves.
If they provided accurate information inside that defense, including personal motivations for behavior, that is worth considering.

In the case of HRC there is plenty of proof of actions.
In your case there are baseless low IQ smears and no evidence, yet you want to dismiss people for providing extremely relevant information and explicit denial of beliefs you are trying to force onto them.

Dodge cuz bad

After his glorious explanation of such a 'very simple concept', is anyone now convinced wearing polo shirts is sufficient proof of white supremacy?

Now that unemployment is so high we should build national infrastructure. Give Trump his wall; put a million people to work on it.