Quote (Black XistenZ @ Nov 14 2019 05:55am)
Do you two disagree with my take a large number of people saw no tangible improvement under Obamacare?
Like... if 20-25% of the population see a big benefit from a policy while 75-80% get next to nothing out of it, while their premiums and deductibles go up - is it fair to criticize this policy? Is it really surprising when such a policy turns out to be polarizing and only of middling popularity?
You're certainly right that Obamacare has not been an abject failure. But it surely wasnt a resounding success either.
The only people it hasn't affected positively are those who work and can't qualify for medicaid but don't earn enough to buy health insurance. A lot of these people out there, paying out of pocket for primary care and unable to see specialists like cardiologist, psychiatrists, pulmonologist, etc.
People who have commercial insurance can now use their insurance. People who couldn't afford insurance typically are covered by medicaid. Not that poor people actually apply for medicaid but it gives hospitals a chance to recoup some money lost because we can't say no when people come in for life saving treatment.
The biggest problem an American health care was pre existing conditions and has been addressed pretty effectively. People just are not getting denied for pre existing conditions anymore when there is necessary stabilization.
But in reality there's no point in describing the affordable care act the people who think it's a different thing than Obama care....so to me it's pretty moot.
Conservatives complained about rural electrification when it happened as a waste of taxpayers dollars. They will literally complain about every change uncritically lol.
Americans have better health insurance 1/2 of them are complaining about it. Keep in mind it is the same half who didn't know the affordable care act Obama care were different things.
This post was edited by Skinned on Nov 14 2019 05:16am