d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Picture Thread
Prev1337133723373337433755001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 105,137
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Nov 13 2019 07:20am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Nov 13 2019 08:12am)




I'll stick with what I said.




And here's a little tidbit to go with folk's morning coffee...





This post was edited by Ghot on Nov 13 2019 07:28am
Member
Posts: 16,455
Joined: May 2 2007
Gold: 20.17
Nov 13 2019 07:43am
Quote (Ghot @ Nov 13 2019 07:32am)
IF you are talking about govt. subsidized healthcare... it will NOT "give our economy a jump start". It will actually increase our deficit.
The US HAS to spend on the military, for the 100th time. The lack of the "threat" of the US military would leave the US and most of the first world countries, ripe for the picking.

By way of example, Australia would be speaking Chinese if there was no threat of US intervention. The EU would probably be speaking Russian or Arabic, and the US would be pretty much gone.

I sincerely hope you're not naive enough to believe that the rest of the world would be able to maintain it's "status quo" with out the threat of the US military.



We'd all love free healthcare, and free education. I hope you seriously don't think there is even one person in the US that wouldn't. But, as with anything, it has to be paid for.



Had someone arguing with me for days and days that Bernie’s healthcare plan was solid as a rock and I needed to stop ‘listening to the mainstream’ when I told her that there was no sound plan in place to pay for it all, she tells me there will be a ‘slight hike’ on our taxes and all in all we will pay less than we pay the insurance company, then tells me to look it up on Bernie’s site, I combed the site and it surely says how we should be spending money on medicare for all and how he’s going to half prescription prices and even make our namebrand medications cheaper than generics are now. Nowhere on the site did I come across his plan to pay for it all, after all it’s a 3trillion/year + plan... then ofc he touts free education too - and that a small tax on all stock transactions will pay for EVERYONE to have at least a bachelors... and forgive all student debt, this guy went to some sort of clown college or something or he’s just straight up insane... my favorite part was that she tells me to stop listening to the mainstream and points me at this guy’s personal campaign website because ofc that is gonna give a great non-biased view right? Ugh the hypocrisy... lmfao... I pointed her at a washington post article that says his plans look too good to be true, because they are. And that’s from the post, pretty sure they lean left pretty hard and they cant even get behind his bs... anyways yeah I think free healthcare and education would be wonderful, but in the process we can’t cripple the country to do it. We definitely can’t take away from military presence, you’re right about that because if we cause no threat then we will cease to exist fast, the world isn’t exactly a nice place tbh.
Member
Posts: 49,893
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Nov 13 2019 07:47am
Quote (Ghot @ Nov 14 2019 12:06am)
In this, I think I'll trust the generals (who are technically on a fixed income) to know how many little plastic pieces they need on the giant RISK board, we are all playing on.


The generals will always push for more funding, as does everyone else.
It's the job of the government to reign it in.

Quote (Ghot @ Nov 13 2019 11:32pm)
IF you are talking about govt. subsidized healthcare... it will NOT "give our economy a jump start". It will actually increase our deficit.
The US HAS to spend on the military, for the 100th time. The lack of the "threat" of the US military would leave the US and most of the first world countries, ripe for the picking.

By way of example, Australia would be speaking Chinese if there was no threat of US intervention. The EU would probably be speaking Russian or Arabic, and the US would be pretty much gone.

I sincerely hope you're not naive enough to believe that the rest of the world would be able to maintain it's "status quo" with out the threat of the US military.



We'd all love free healthcare, and free education. I hope you seriously don't think there is even one person in the US that wouldn't. But, as with anything, it has to be paid for.


If China wanted Australia they would have it and nothing short of a nuclear holocaust could prevent it, by the time the us would be able to mobilize we would already be a wasteland.
The fact is China can buy us cheaper than they can annex us so them invading is a dumb thought bubble those on the right keep spouting off but has zero chance of happening with or without the tiny us presence in this region.

So which Arabic country could conquer Europe and its multiple nuclear countries?

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Nov 13 2019 07:50am
Member
Posts: 16,455
Joined: May 2 2007
Gold: 20.17
Nov 13 2019 07:48am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Nov 13 2019 07:58am)
All of this security would still exist if the US spent "only" $300 billion per year on its military instead of the current $693 billion.



Here’s the real question for you, if we saved 393billion/yr on military expenses how does that pay for a 3trillion/yr healthcare plan.

And literally you’re saying lets cut over half of military spending, the us has plenty of enemies out there and if we cut 4/7ths of our military you can trust that its only going to be 3/7ths as strong as it is. Overkill as you call it is what’s keeping us safe. I’m with ghot, the generals know what’s up with this shit.
Member
Posts: 105,137
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Nov 13 2019 07:49am
Quote (Drakwen @ Nov 13 2019 08:43am)
THIS



I seriously love your avatar. :)

Member
Posts: 49,893
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Nov 13 2019 07:50am
Quote (Drakwen @ Nov 14 2019 12:48am)
Here’s the real question for you, if we saved 393billion/yr on military expenses how does that pay for a 3trillion/yr healthcare plan.

And literally you’re saying lets cut over half of military spending, the us has plenty of enemies out there and if we cut 4/7ths of our military you can trust that its only going to be 3/7ths as strong as it is. Overkill as you call it is what’s keeping us safe. I’m with ghot, the generals know what’s up with this shit.


Because that 3 trillion number is a fantasy.
Member
Posts: 105,137
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Nov 13 2019 07:50am
Quote (Plaguefear @ Nov 13 2019 08:47am)
The generals will always push for more funding, as does everyone else.
It's the job of the government to reign it in.



If China wanted Australia they would have it and nothing short of a nuclear holocaust could prevent it, by the time the us would be able to mobilize we would already be a wasteland.
The fact is China can buy us cheaper than they can annex us so them invading is a dumb thought bubble those on the right keep spouting off but has zero chance of happening with or without the tiny us presence in this region.




Australia isn't stupid enough to sell out to China. THAT is why we need the military.



/e

Quote (Plaguefear @ Nov 13 2019 08:50am)
Because that 3 trillion number is a fantasy.


You're right. 3 trillion/year is LESS than what it would cost.

This post was edited by Ghot on Nov 13 2019 07:52am
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Nov 13 2019 07:51am
Quote (Drakwen @ Nov 13 2019 07:48am)
Here’s the real question for you, if we saved 393billion/yr on military expenses how does that pay for a 3trillion/yr healthcare plan.

And literally you’re saying lets cut over half of military spending, the us has plenty of enemies out there and if we cut 4/7ths of our military you can trust that its only going to be 3/7ths as strong as it is. Overkill as you call it is what’s keeping us safe. I’m with ghot, the generals know what’s up with this shit.


Considering even the most conservative groups estimate we would save a trillion over 10 years (less biased groups say 2.2 trillion) compared with current insurance premium cost we wouldnt have to put any if that towards healthcare spending. It would, however, pay for a shit load of roads and easily pay the estimated 600 billion over ten years for free college.

Our military would be weaker, but since we currently outspend our next 7 competitors combined, all but 2 are our allies, we would be fine.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Nov 13 2019 07:53am
Member
Posts: 49,893
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Nov 13 2019 07:52am
Quote (Ghot @ Nov 14 2019 12:50am)
Australia isn't stupid enough to sell out to China. THAT is why we need the military.


We literally sold them the port of Darwin..
Member
Posts: 49,893
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Nov 13 2019 07:53am
Quote (Ghot @ Nov 14 2019 12:50am)
Australia isn't stupid enough to sell out to China. THAT is why we need the military.



/e



You're right. 3 trillion/year is LESS than what it would cost.


Yeah ok, I'll take your word for it, except I live in the system I advocate and medical costs here are a tenth of yours..
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1337133723373337433755001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll