Quote (Ghot @ Nov 14 2019 12:06am)
In this, I think I'll trust the generals (who are technically on a fixed income) to know how many little plastic pieces they need on the giant RISK board, we are all playing on.
The generals will always push for more funding, as does everyone else.
It's the job of the government to reign it in.
Quote (Ghot @ Nov 13 2019 11:32pm)
IF you are talking about govt. subsidized healthcare... it will NOT "give our economy a jump start". It will actually increase our deficit.
The US HAS to spend on the military, for the 100th time. The lack of the "threat" of the US military would leave the US and most of the first world countries, ripe for the picking.
By way of example, Australia would be speaking Chinese if there was no threat of US intervention. The EU would probably be speaking Russian or Arabic, and the US would be pretty much gone.
I sincerely hope you're not naive enough to believe that the rest of the world would be able to maintain it's "status quo" with out the threat of the US military.
We'd all love free healthcare, and free education. I hope you seriously don't think there is even one person in the US that wouldn't. But, as with anything, it has to be paid for.
If China wanted Australia they would have it and nothing short of a nuclear holocaust could prevent it, by the time the us would be able to mobilize we would already be a wasteland.
The fact is China can buy us cheaper than they can annex us so them invading is a dumb thought bubble those on the right keep spouting off but has zero chance of happening with or without the tiny us presence in this region.
So which Arabic country could conquer Europe and its multiple nuclear countries?
This post was edited by Plaguefear on Nov 13 2019 07:50am