d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Joe Biden 2020 Thread
Prev13353363373383391037Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 4,802
Joined: Feb 6 2020
Gold: 347.20
Jan 26 2021 11:30am
Quote (fender @ Jan 25 2021 04:50pm)
what? pretty much everyone knows thor.


his statement still stand. look around and you'll see there ain't that many wolves on jsp.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jan 26 2021 11:47am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 26 2021 11:25am)
Biden's penchant for EOs is not just out of step with whatever the hell Trump was doing, it's also unusual compared to Obama, W. Bush and Clinton. Misconduct or bad practices by Trump are not an excuse for misconduct or bad practices by the Biden amdin. :rolleyes:


Again, look at content not numbers.

Are these orders actual overreach and why?

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jan 26 2021 11:47am
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Jan 26 2021 11:53am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 26 2021 12:25pm)
Biden's penchant for EOs is not just out of step with whatever the hell Trump was doing, it's also unusual compared to Obama, W. Bush and Clinton. Misconduct or bad practices by Trump are not an excuse for misconduct or bad practices by the Biden amdin. :rolleyes:


According to Wikipedia Trump averaged 55 executive orders per year, compared with Obama's 35 per year. I don't recall any Trump supporters here criticizing that increase.

This may just be evidence that Biden's team was more prepared than Trump's to get the executive orders through at the outset of the administration.

Although, I'm not sure why executive orders are inherently bad. To me, it just looks like governing.

This post was edited by IceMage on Jan 26 2021 11:54am
Member
Posts: 93,005
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,214.94
Jan 26 2021 11:56am
Quote (IceMage @ Jan 26 2021 11:53am)
According to Wikipedia Trump had 55 executive orders per year, compared with Obama's 35 per year. I don't recall any Trump supporters here criticizing that increase.

This may just be evidence that Biden's team was more prepared than Trump's to get the executive orders through at the outset of the administration.

Although, I'm not sure why executive orders are inherently bad. To me, it just looks like governing.


i asked them repeatedly, and pre him passing Obama it was "he is still less than obama" and post him passing it was "well it's nanci and chucks fault for stonewalling". even tho he held the senate, and even tho when mitch stonewalled obama for 6 years they cheered, loudly.

these dumb dumbs just cant get it right.
Member
Posts: 54,196
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jan 26 2021 12:23pm
Quote (IceMage @ 26 Jan 2021 18:53)
According to Wikipedia Trump averaged 55 executive orders per year, compared with Obama's 35 per year. I don't recall any Trump supporters here criticizing that increase.

Quote (thesnipa @ 26 Jan 2021 18:56)
i asked them repeatedly, and pre him passing Obama it was "he is still less than obama" and post him passing it was "well it's nanci and chucks fault for stonewalling".

55 per year is a different ballpark than 33 within just one week. And Trump had just 4 within his first year in office in 2017, when his party had trifecta control (like Biden does now.)

Quote (IceMage)
This may just be evidence that Biden's team was more prepared than Trump's to get the executive orders through at the outset of the administration.

True, I expect Biden to slow down after the initial flurry of preplanned EOs. Still an alarming pace.

Quote (IceMage)
Although, I'm not sure why executive orders are inherently bad. To me, it just looks like governing.

The executive slowly usurping powers from the legislative is a disturbance to the system of checks and balances, and therefore bad.

Quote (thesnipa)
even tho he held the senate, and even tho when mitch stonewalled obama for 6 years they cheered, loudly. these dumb dumbs just cant get it right.

When a president cant get policy passed through Congress because the voters had specifically taken away control from his party, the expectation is that he either stops passing policy, or works really hard for genuine bipartisan compromise instead of stubbornly pushing ahead. (And for the record: Obama and Trump are both massively guilty of that.)

Conversely, it is an indictment for a president to have both chambers of Congress and resort to executive authority nonetheless, without even trying to find legislative majorities. For example, if Biden wants to stop the Keystone XL pipeline or grant amnesty, he should put these issues up for debate in Congress instead of trying to ram them through via EO. If Congress gridlocks on them, he can still go back to the EO route...

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jan 26 2021 12:26pm
Member
Posts: 93,005
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,214.94
Jan 26 2021 12:30pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 26 2021 12:23pm)
55 per year is a different ballpark than 33 within just one week. And Trump had just 4 within his first year in office in 2017, when his party had trifecta control (like Biden does now.)


True, I expect Biden to slow down after the initial flurry of preplanned EOs. Still an alarming pace.


The executive slowly usurping powers from the legislative is a disturbance to the system of checks and balances, and therefore bad.


When a president cant get policy passed through Congress because the voters had specifically taken away control from his party, the expectation is that he either stops passing policy, or works really hard for genuine bipartisan compromise instead of stubbornly pushing ahead. (And for the record: Obama and Trump are both massively guilty of that.)

Conversely, it is an indictment for a president to have majorities in both chambers of Congress and resort to executive authority nonetheless, without even trying to find legislative majorities. For example, if Biden wants to stop the Keystone XL pipeline and grant amnesty, he should put these issues up for debate in Congress instead of trying to ram them through via EO. If Congress gridlocks on them, he can still go back to the EO route...


the thing is that Trump brought the lack of bipartisan reality on himself with deeply divisive statements and countless fumbles. Obama got into the same situation by being black. honestly, look back, one of obama's greatest "gaffes" was saying "he could have been my son" in response to a kid who was shot. and this was WELL before the facts of the case were clear, and it was an empathetic but rushed statement. Trump called literal KKK members fine people. they were holding up mannequins of Obama with nooses around the necks before he was even elected.

when i hear the two compared i just have to laugh, its a riot really. i didnt even like obama, but holy LOL.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Jan 26 2021 12:34pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 26 Jan 2021 19:23)
55 per year is a different ballpark than 33 within just one week. And Trump had just 4 within his first year in office in 2017, when his party had trifecta control (like Biden does now.)


True, I expect Biden to slow down after the initial flurry of preplanned EOs. Still an alarming pace.


The executive slowly usurping powers from the legislative is a disturbance to the system of checks and balances, and therefore bad.


When a president cant get policy passed through Congress because the voters had specifically taken away control from his party, the expectation is that he either stops passing policy, or works really hard for genuine bipartisan compromise instead of stubbornly pushing ahead. (And for the record: Obama and Trump are both massively guilty of that.)

Conversely, it is an indictment for a president to have majorities in both chambers of Congress and resort to executive authority nonetheless, without even trying to find legislative majorities. For example, if Biden wants to stop the Keystone XL pipeline and grant amnesty, he should put these issues up for debate in Congress instead of trying to ram them through via EO. If Congress gridlocks on them, he can still go back to the EO route...


i love how all of a sudden you pretend to care about executive overreach, checks and balances, and going through congress instead of ruling by executive order. funny how that wasn't a problem when trump issued an EO that lead to the longest shutdown in US history over his stupid wall project.

absolutely amazing how shamelessly hypocritical you are, as if people couldn't recognise blatant partisan hackery, lol.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Jan 26 2021 12:46pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 26 2021 01:23pm)
55 per year is a different ballpark than 33 within just one week. And Trump had just 4 within his first year in office in 2017, when his party had trifecta control (like Biden does now.)


True, I expect Biden to slow down after the initial flurry of preplanned EOs. Still an alarming pace.


The executive slowly usurping powers from the legislative is a disturbance to the system of checks and balances, and therefore bad.


I'm with Thor... it seems like a weak argument to say that executive orders are inherently bad. Apparently 12 of the orders are just reversing things Trump did.

And the bloated administrative state exists because of Congress. They've willingly handed over their power to the executive for decades.

I remember right-wingers complaining about Obama's executive orders constantly... and then there was radio silence in the Trump years. It's one of the bad faith cudgels used when Democrats are in the White House.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jan 26 2021 12:54pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 26 2021 12:30pm)
the thing is that Trump brought the lack of bipartisan reality on himself with deeply divisive statements and countless fumbles. Obama got into the same situation by being black. honestly, look back, one of obama's greatest "gaffes" was saying "he could have been my son" in response to a kid who was shot. and this was WELL before the facts of the case were clear, and it was an empathetic but rushed statement. Trump called literal KKK members fine people. they were holding up mannequins of Obama with nooses around the necks before he was even elected.

when i hear the two compared i just have to laugh, its a riot really. i didnt even like obama, but holy LOL.


I no longer feel my constant corrections on the Charlotte incident was wasted
Member
Posts: 54,196
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jan 26 2021 12:56pm
Quote (thesnipa @ 26 Jan 2021 19:30)
the thing is that Trump brought the lack of bipartisan reality on himself with deeply divisive statements and countless fumbles. Obama got into the same situation by being black. honestly, look back, one of obama's greatest "gaffes" was saying "he could have been my son" in response to a kid who was shot. and this was WELL before the facts of the case were clear, and it was an empathetic but rushed statement. Trump called literal KKK members fine people. they were holding up mannequins of Obama with nooses around the necks before he was even elected.

when i hear the two compared i just have to laugh, its a riot really. i didnt even like obama, but holy LOL.


Yeah, right, people only ever disagreed with Obama because of ubiquitous racism, not because they disagreed with him on the substance... I mean, how could anyone ever disagree with Obama's policies?

Quote (fender @ 26 Jan 2021 19:34)
i love how all of a sudden you pretend to care about executive overreach, checks and balances, and going through congress instead of ruling by executive order. funny how that wasn't a problem when trump issued an EO that lead to the longest shutdown in US history over his stupid wall project.

absolutely amazing how shamelessly hypocritical you are, as if people couldn't recognise blatant partisan hackery, lol.


I was not a fan of Trump shutting down the government to get his wall funding, it was one of the bigger political miscalculations of his presidency.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev13353363373383391037Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll