Quote (thesnipa @ 23 Oct 2019 16:36)
this is a sad reality, but i wonder if she would have faced a lawsuit if, hypothetically, the boy remained in treatment but still shot up the school. also i wonder if the school faces and suits based on their social work intra-school, that clearly didn't prevent this.
one common string we see in shooters is many are in treatment or were in treatment. and another common string is lawsuits lobbed at the parents of the shooter by parents of dead children. in some cases it's certainly warranted, negligent or abusive parenting that leads to a school shooter is fairly causal.
sadly when tragedy strikes and the dust settles the next question is who pays for the damages. will it be the gun store, the parents, video game producers, marilyn manson?
to be fair, had authorities intervened and taken the guns away, many 2nd amendment enthusiasts would have been all over it and complained about the unreasonable overreach by the tyrannical government.
concerning your first scenario, it's hard to say. i mean, reason and logic tell us that the chance of him going through would have been smaller had he remained in treatment, but obviously that doesn't outright prevent it.
it's really a shitty situation, and as long as there is not massive abuse or negligence on the parents' side, it's really hard to establish a direct responsibility. i mean, it's hard to not sympathise for and understand where both sides are coming from here, it's just tragic that with all that talk about mental health being the REAL culprit, not even such obvious potential threats are covered - it's almost like all that concern about it primarily serves as an excuse, and not as an area for political action...