Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Dec 5 2021 10:37pm)
Just proves my point lol. The system you described would not result in higher wages lowering the amount of working hours you can employ because it accounts for the increase in wages over time.
You're just not terribly perceptive, so you don't see that your anecdote supports my position lol
Again, if you want an invite to the discord just let me know. I'll even post one here for anybody to use.
nY4MhABrqQ
You do this almost every single day. You are wrong but you use word salad to seem right. You are still wrong about this.
If the past five years I have spent x on labor.
Corporate checks what was actually spent on labor vs sales and whatever else.
They make their budget based off of the past 5 years.
The average in the stupid example I made was 12.50, to keep nice even numbers for your dumb ass.
They are looking at all the data, and the labor cost for that entire 5 year span is 12.50 when you average it out.
Therefore when labor actually costs $15, because of the way the budget is made, the labor costs more than makes sense for the budget, because they look at money spent over hours worked. This is how my company works out the labor budget.
Idk how to dumb it down any more than that. My company doesn’t look at the current minimum wage to make budgets. Just doesn’t work like that. Maybe it should, but it doesn’t. I am not wrong. This is just a tiny fraction of the bullshit I deal with every week. You can misinterpret this a million more ways to make it look like idk what I’m talking about, but in truth you are just a sad asshole, who is just wrong about this.