d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Big Tech Strikes Back
Prev1323334353641Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 5,216
Joined: Sep 18 2020
Gold: 101.80
Warn: 70%
Jan 12 2021 05:46pm
it's called sifting through all the bullshit for half a life-time and finding the truth
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jan 12 2021 05:56pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Jan 12 2021 12:51am)


Confirmed conspiracy theory
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jan 12 2021 07:14pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Jan 12 2021 05:56pm)
Confirmed conspiracy theory


I already addressed that the info in that image I posted previously was incorrect.
Member
Posts: 54,180
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jan 12 2021 07:36pm
Quote (RedFromWinter @ 12 Jan 2021 15:00)
You are missing the bigger, more sinister picture. These governments want more controls over the internet, whatever the justification. Today it will be under the guise of 'free and open public discourse' by blocking the 'big bad' sites and apps. This whole conversation is retarded though, everyone is arguing about Tech on the wrong abstraction layer. All the abstraction layers down from an actual HTML, CSS, JS, WASM, ETC website and DNS routings should be guarded and not dicked around with. If your organization doesn't have the 'know how' to setup shop, learn to compete. Just sounds like a lot of web service platform entitlement aka pay to win rhetoric that boomers spew.

Imagine Parler is setup on a private server farm, but Google DNS is dicked around with so no traffic ever gets there. That would be nasty.


The terms and conditions for public discourse must be set by someone, no doubt about that. But the Euros are right, it must be the courts and the democratically elected governments who do this, not Silicon Valley plutocrats. Does this mean more power to them? Yes. But, and that's the key distinction, they would still have to answer to their voters - Zuckerberg, Dorsey and Bezos dont.
Member
Posts: 54,180
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jan 12 2021 07:49pm
Quote (IceMage @ 12 Jan 2021 15:54)
https://twitter.com/ezraklein/status/1348816719020650497

I agree with much of this thread. Big Tech silencing people worries me to some extent... but the vast majority of what I've seen has been justified.


Sorry, but do you seriously buy that stuff? :lol:

Ezra Klein writes:
Quote
"But that reflects a deeper fact of Trump, and those like him: They leave us with no good options. Ignore Trump's worst comments, his most noxious followers, and you're normalizing horrifying behavior. Cover them and you're giving them exactly what they want: Attention, energy. It was always lose-lose. There was no good strategy.[...]

The platforms didn't want to make these choices. That's why they refused to make them for years and years. They did nothing and more nothing, and the result was a violent attack on the Capitol that left people dead. They're acting now because inaction failed so totally."


LOL! Trump was Twitter's cash cow, and they milked it dry until the very last moment.

Going beyond Twitter alone: from an ideological/political standpoint, these Big Tech execs had been wanting to silence Trump and figures who think like him for years. They waited until his power had evaporated (voted out of office, term about to expire) and public opinion had sharply turned against him. It's delusional to think that they didnt pull the plug earlier out of concern for freedom of speech or for democratic norms. In reality, they simply were too coward to really go after him because declaring open war on the sitting president would have risked more regulatory oversight or a rebellion from his entire votership (say around 40-45% of the country), rather than just the hiatus of his inner base (~15-25% of the country) that we're seeing now.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jan 12 2021 07:50pm
Member
Posts: 105,148
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jan 12 2021 07:58pm


Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jan 12 2021 07:59pm
Member
Posts: 49,894
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Jan 12 2021 09:01pm
Quote (Ghot @ Jan 13 2021 12:58pm)


Free speech never applied to private entities.
Member
Posts: 105,148
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jan 12 2021 09:24pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Jan 12 2021 10:01pm)
Free speech never applied to private entities.



I don't consider social media... private.
It's a place for posting w/e.

It wouldn't be too bad if they weren't biased. I mean they delete, ban conservative things, yet the Dems/left can say w/e. LOL
Member
Posts: 38,671
Joined: Apr 1 2007
Gold: 8.21
Jan 12 2021 09:31pm
Quote (Ghot @ Jan 12 2021 07:24pm)
I don't consider social media... private.
It's a place for posting w/e.

It wouldn't be too bad if they weren't biased. I mean they delete, ban conservative things, yet the Dems/left can say w/e. LOL


also the ayatollah who routinely posts on twitter about how Iran will cleanse the jews off the planet lol
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1323334353641Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll