I'll answer both of you... you're WRONG. Being as how this is the ACTUAL quote from that topic. For shame, editing quotes, tsk, tsk. :/


















Seriously bad. Purposely misquoting via edit, and then linking the proof that you would try something this... bent.

sounds about right

You didn't do anything. You're now quoting something from 6 days ago with no response. You have in no way showed you're not a hypocritical idiot.

Luls post time and edit time are 4 minutes apart which is the time i dug up the post from you and edited. You must be slow in the head.

This post was edited by SBD on Sep 24 2018 10:29pm

Look at post 286 to post 301, where I quoted you tonight. I was referring to your arbitrary adding of the word IF, which WAS the subject at hand back on the 18th.

/e Not only did you misquote me, and add the word IF... you also linked some other topic entirely as proof of your point?

This post was edited by Ghot on Sep 25 2018 12:52am

Yes. I'm showing the level of hypocrisy you exhibit. Court is only good if it fits your agenda. I am not sure how this is still going over your head.

This post was edited by SBD on Sep 25 2018 01:07pm

No dude, you're attempting to be clever and failing miserably. You are comparing two entirely different incidents with entirely different circumstances and misquoting me at the same time.
I don't know why it is, but some folk seem to have a lot of trouble with topic titles.

i bet you wish for pard to have opinions contained to the topic when you blow out all 72 candles on your birthday. doesn't work like that, your previous opinions dont exist in a vacuum and can and will be brought up to show when hypocrites are being hypocritical. that's just how this place works. it is up to you to explain the differences that make it not hypocritical, you can't just lazily say "different day, different topic", at least not while maintaining credibility. im not even sure that matters to you tbh, if it does you're not good at it. then again your reuters for all sourcing shows at least a shred of fear in how youre perceived. i find most geezers your age have a general "idc what you whipersnappers think" attitude that really just masks a fear you'll one day be misunderstood to a whole group of people that you'll never be able to explain yourself too.

If the topics were AT ALL related, I would agree. But you can't assign one response to a person for wildly different incidents.
You need to learn that, sooner rather than later. The world just doesn't work that way.

On top of all that. my initial issue with the post of someone...who wasn't you, was just that he edited what I had said.
So there's another thing you need to learn. You are not his keeper. He is a grown man, I assume, and can argue for himself.

you'd have a really good point if he sneakily edited it to make you look foolish, instead he blatantly changes what the post said in a mocking re-write of your post to make you look foolish. this would be like you calling a parody a "rip off". surely you know what a parody is, i bet you've watched monty python n such.

also, above, on this very page, you said "i'll answer you both" and quoted me. you didn't have to. but it prevents you from trying all that "you're not his keeper" bullshit now. you summoned me, a demon you cant understand let alone control.

You're a demon, in your dreams. LMAO

You were right the first time, you're a parody.