d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev13283293303313323169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 38,317
Joined: Jul 12 2006
Gold: 20.31
May 16 2016 04:10pm
Re: the story that Trump acted as his on press secretary, there's been a canvass over the last few days of groups that regularly do opposition research and at least so far, the consensus is that it's definitely Trump speaking but people aren't sold on claim that only two people (Trump and the original reporter) had the original media. Either way, there's still no official confirmation on either. But it seems like the Trump campaign is aware of this consensus belief (that it is him, and that someone else does have the media), so I imagine you're gonna see a lot of this this week: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/280044-trump-ally-on-spokesman-story-trump-wanted-to-get-his-spin-on-a

This is just Trump's version of the Federalist Papers!

Quote (thesnipa @ May 16 2016 01:38pm)
The fact that you all sit around the water cooler and share stories from an insignificant suforum with each other is just so sad...

I don't even relay the horseshit here to my wifey much less coworkers. Sad really.


LOL well you've got the medium totally wrong (nevermind the input), which is a little comical considering we're ourselves interacting on a forum. It's simple [drag url] into a specific header, little different from how we use this site. Amusingly it took you longer to type that than it does for me to drag/drop something to any sub-community that finds humor in the herping and derping that happens here.

Can't say I waste the time of family and friends with the goings-on of this or any other website though. If anyone else does then that's their choice, no judgment. When I leave the office everyday I leave stuff like this with it.
Member
Posts: 52,044
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
May 16 2016 04:33pm
Well snipa, you got the medium wrong, therefore your entire argument is null! He's now magically not a sad sack because he shares the PaRD follies via <insert medium like email>!
Member
Posts: 49,872
Joined: Dec 23 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 16 2016 05:21pm
Funny how poll boy accuses trump of taking super pac and big donor bucks but if you ever listened to his debates and speeches you'd know he said he'd probably have to. Do a little homework before you open your mouth? Everyone knows he's not going out of pocket for the general which he already stated. Meanwhile you say Hillary has built a juggernaut of a ground game and she doesn't even have a lead of less than 300 pledged delegates. She's going to get her ass handed to her in California it will also be a close race in Kentucky. An old man socialist just continues to beat your candidate at every turn this past month. I hope it goes to a contested convention and Biden gets the nod.
Member
Posts: 48,844
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
May 16 2016 05:30pm
The media reaction to this New York Times piece is hilarious to watch. I've managed to catch some reaction today from MSNBC, CNN, and Fox, and the consensus is that it's not much of a story. One of the girls cited in the article came onto Fox News and said the NYT manipulated her words, leaving out the part where she talked positively about Trump.

It's a weird life for a Never Trumper who despises the liberal media.
Member
Posts: 40,238
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Gold: 4,921.71
May 16 2016 05:34pm
Quote (Pollster @ May 16 2016 05:10pm)
Re: the story that Trump acted as his on press secretary, there's been a canvass over the last few days of groups that regularly do opposition research and at least so far, the consensus is that it's definitely Trump speaking but people aren't sold on claim that only two people (Trump and the original reporter) had the original media. Either way, there's still no official confirmation on either. But it seems like the Trump campaign is aware of this consensus belief (that it is him, and that someone else does have the media), so I imagine you're gonna see a lot of this this week: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/280044-trump-ally-on-spokesman-story-trump-wanted-to-get-his-spin-on-a

This is just Trump's version of the Federalist Papers!



LOL well you've got the medium totally wrong (nevermind the input), which is a little comical considering we're ourselves interacting on a forum. It's simple [drag url] into a specific header, little different from how we use this site. Amusingly it took you longer to type that than it does for me to drag/drop something to any sub-community that finds humor in the herping and derping that happens here.

Can't say I waste the time of family and friends with the goings-on of this or any other website though. If anyone else does then that's their choice, no judgment. When I leave the office everyday I leave stuff like this with it.


i wanna see what you look like
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,296.75
May 16 2016 05:37pm
Quote (IceMage @ May 16 2016 03:30pm)
The media reaction to this New York Times piece is hilarious to watch. I've managed to catch some reaction today from MSNBC, CNN, and Fox, and the consensus is that it's not much of a story. One of the girls cited in the article came onto Fox News and said the NYT manipulated her words, leaving out the part where she talked positively about Trump.

It's a weird life for a Never Trumper who despises the liberal media.


Him lying when he is already on record admitting to a court that he has used those names before wasn't a smart move. He should have came out and yeah it was me and beat his chest to rile up his cavemen followers. I don't know if I am convinced he released them as I think he is actually embarrassed about doing stuff like that as he should be.

As far as news reporters doing hit pieces using ex girlfriend's words in unintentional ways I think they should stop covering crap that doesn't matter. If they really want to get to the bottom of his personal interactions with women they should look into the sexual assault accusations.

I bet Trump has a lot of skeletons in the closet but I wouldn't be surprised if he only worries about the ones that make him look pathetic rather than immoral or scummy.

I say leave all the dumb shit to the tabloids and stop covering it all day on mainstream media
Member
Posts: 48,844
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
May 16 2016 05:41pm
Quote (Beowulf @ May 16 2016 06:37pm)
Him lying when he is already on record admitting to a court that he has used those names before wasn't a smart move. He should have came out and yeah it was me and beat his chest to rile up his cavemen followers. I don't know if I am convinced he released them as I think he is actually embarrassed about doing stuff like that as he should be.

As far as news reporters doing hit pieces using ex girlfriend's words in unintentional ways I think they should stop covering crap that doesn't matter. If they really want to get to the bottom of his personal interactions with women they should look into the sexual assault accusations.

I bet Trump has a lot of skeletons in the closet but I wouldn't be surprised if he only worries about the ones that make him look pathetic rather than immoral or scummy.

I say leave all the dumb shit to the tabloids and stop covering it all day on mainstream media


It's standard Trump procedure... double down on being wrong/lying and wait for the next headline to sweep the last one away.
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,296.75
May 16 2016 05:49pm
Quote (IceMage @ May 16 2016 03:41pm)
It's standard Trump procedure... double down on being wrong/lying and wait for the next headline to sweep the last one away.


They probably are wanting to get the ex girlfriends to say he paid them or convinced them to get abortions but now that they twisted the one gals words around to push a dumb narrative they have lost the power of the ex girlfriend stories to come
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Sep 10 2007
Gold: 25.00
May 16 2016 05:56pm
Quote (Beowulf @ May 16 2016 06:49pm)
They probably are wanting to get the ex girlfriends to say he paid them or convinced them to get abortions but now that they twisted the one gals words around to push a dumb narrative they have lost the power of the ex girlfriend stories to come


all of his exs have come forward saying they support him, hes great, and they're voting for him.

The media needs to focus on the bullshit he says NOW instead of the shit 20+ years ago because a) it doesn't work and b) it makes them have even less credibility when they get stumped time after time.

I have no idea why people are spending millions of dollars to dig up dirt from the past when there are actual legitimate things worth attacking in the here and now.
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,296.75
May 16 2016 06:03pm
Quote (Mangix @ May 16 2016 03:56pm)
all of his exs have come forward saying they support him, hes great, and they're voting for him.

The media needs to focus on the bullshit he says NOW instead of the shit 20+ years ago because a) it doesn't work and b) it makes them have even less credibility when they get stumped time after time.

I have no idea why people are spending millions of dollars to dig up dirt from the past when there are actual legitimate things worth attacking in the here and now.


I'm ready for debates. I'm tired of hearing about how Bernie would do against Trump and I am tired of just about everything Trump related in the news.

I'm ready for these two jerkoffs to duke it out on stage
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev13283293303313323169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll