Quote (fender @ 20 Mar 2019 19:47)
yet another ridiculous and entirely baseless claim - how can you people expect to be taken seriously when all you do is lie and fearmonger?
again, the facts don't care about your feelings and idiotic conspiracy theories.
so migrants applying for asylum despite not having the right to do so is a lie?
multiple applications and reentering the country despite being banned is not a thing according to you? merkel herself saw to that when she cried about seehofers 63 point list
how about getting state handouts despite an illegal status and unknown identity?
deportations simply not enforced?
the blatant abuse of the "duldung" (exceptional leave to remain in english) despite it being very clear that this still means you have to leave the country?
ask a random police officer who is dealing with deportations, one day you get a court order to go through, the next day you will get the opposite
or how about systematically not investigating cases of terrorism/war crimes among our new rocket scientists?
thats just mentioning a few facts
bu if fender or poo dont pay their GEZ or a parking ticket in time all hell breaks loose
you can be as naive or stupid or ignorant as you like, that list of facts wont go away and no regular citizen OR legal migrant would get the same treatment
however the pathetic "punishments" for violent criminals resulting from borderline crazy efforts to give the lowest sentence possible are a fact for everyone, thats what Black XistenZ is talking about (as well as i)
but i am sure you will find a way to turn this into a fenderp conspiracy theory again
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 20 Mar 2019 20:16)
im not saying that the law treated him differently because he was a migrant - that was ampoo.
in fact, the courts and police treated him according to the law - which is exactly my point: our current law is unsuitable for dealing with individuals like him.
not when it comes to criminal charges, as i said above
however there are quite a few cases, where the islam bonus couldnt be more obvious
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 20 Mar 2019 18:06)
doing it once, probably. but then, security for important public figures would be increased and they couldnt pull it off again.
maybe I'm influenced by the german history:
during the 1970s, we had an extremistic left-wing terrorist group called the Red Army Faction (RAF) which terrorized the country for several years. but they only targeted representatives of "the class enemy", conservative politicians, generals, on one occasion, they abducted and later murdered the president of the german employer's association. during this time, a considerable amount of far-left-leaning people who werent extremists themselves secretly rooted for the RAF, some of them even gave them shelter or other logistical support. this was only possible specifically because an ordinary citizen knew that the RAF was not targetting them, it was only targetting "fat cats" that he didnt like anyway.
similarly, while a successful attack on politicians would have a higher symbolic effect, I dont know if it would instill the same amount of fear into the hearts of ordinary citizens if they knew that the terrorist were targetting public figures and fat cats instead of them, random civilians. but maybe I'm wrong.
several years? you mean decades
This post was edited by ampoo on Mar 20 2019 02:13pm