d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Picture Thread
Prev1324732483249325032515001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 77,660
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 500.00
Sep 26 2019 07:25am
Quote (CarsV @ Sep 26 2019 09:20am)
Link isn't working for me. Give me the tl;dr.


The authors of the graph seem to be sketchy/non existent
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Sep 26 2019 12:21pm
Member
Posts: 104,564
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 26 2019 02:57pm
Quote (duffman316 @ Sep 26 2019 09:25am)
The authors of the graph seem to be sketchy/non existent




http://www.longrangeweather.com/About-Us.htm
Member
Posts: 77,660
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 500.00
Sep 26 2019 03:06pm
Quote (Ghot @ Sep 26 2019 04:57pm)


Google harris-mann climatology and click on the links where they arent trying to sell something
Member
Posts: 104,564
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 26 2019 03:09pm
Quote (duffman316 @ Sep 26 2019 05:06pm)
Google harris-mann climatology and click on the links where they arent trying to sell something




I did. Most are blogs or forum responses.
Did you think that two guys saying this climate crap was BS, are going to get reasonable search results on Google?
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Sep 26 2019 03:09pm
Quote (Ghot @ Sep 26 2019 10:57pm)


So they've actually done no science at all. Being quoted in a newspaper =/= publishing peer reviewed papers in well reputed journals. They're not in the same ballpark, not even in the same city.

Got anything to show that they do have any aptitude in the field?
Member
Posts: 104,564
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 26 2019 03:11pm
Quote (balrog66 @ Sep 26 2019 05:09pm)
So they've actually done no science at all. Being quoted in a newspaper =/= publishing peer reviewed papers in well reputed journals. They're not in the same ballpark, not even in the same city.

Got anything to show that they do have any aptitude in the field?




Do you have anything not opinion related that shows they don't?

/e Doesn't it seem strange to you, that the climate change fans are stooping to sending a disabled, brainwashed kid around to solicit tears? I don't see ANY science there. Just watched a vid of Greta w/o her pre-prepared speech....she was asked a question. Not only did she miss the question, but then had one word answer, that amounted to silence.

This post was edited by Ghot on Sep 26 2019 03:15pm
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Sep 26 2019 03:14pm
Quote (Ghot @ Sep 25 2019 07:03pm)


Just counting number of eruptions is pretty useless. You need to quantify the intensity of eruption for it to be a meaningful metric.

Quote (Ghot @ Sep 26 2019 04:11pm)
Do you have anything not opinion related that shows they don't?

/e Doesn't it seem strange to you, that the climate change fans are stooping to sending a disabled, brainwashed kid around to solicit tears? I don't see ANY science there.


It's not up to anybody to show they don't. It's up to you to support your source by showing they do.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Sep 26 2019 03:15pm
Member
Posts: 104,564
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 26 2019 03:16pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 26 2019 05:14pm)
Just counting number of eruptions is pretty useless. You need to quantify the intensity of eruption for it to be a meaningful metric.



It's not up to anybody to show they don't. It's up to you to support your source by showing they do.


That's the exact opposite of what you tried to sell last year.

Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Sep 26 2019 03:18pm
Quote (Ghot @ Sep 26 2019 11:11pm)
Do you have anything not opinion related that shows they don't?


That link you posted is enough already.

If all you can post as credentials for your scientific prowess is "I've been quoted in newspapers and on CNN", and doing weather forecasts for a long time, that's not enough. Note that this the best picture, as it is what they use to promote themselves.

It's like someone trying to disprove relativity with "I've been quoted in newspapers on planets and I present a tv show on the lunar cycle." The credentials are not relevant.

Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 26 2019 11:14pm)
Just counting number of eruptions is pretty useless. You need to quantify the intensity of eruption for it to be a meaningful metric.



It's not up to anybody to show they don't. It's up to you to support your source by showing they do.



Tbh the graph can be thrown in the garbage for not labeling axes correctly alone. If I pulled that on a paper in grad school that'd be an automatic fail.

This post was edited by balrog66 on Sep 26 2019 03:19pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1324732483249325032515001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll