Your last meme is literally correct and all trans people would gladly say so.



He refused to answer my question about confiscating guns from the police first, who kill and terrorize people with what Beto calls "weapons of war" every day.

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Sep 19 2019 06:36pm

OIne thing I don't understand about rans people... they could just keep their sex genetials, but find partners who are masuline but sexually female and feminine and sexually male. and be happy that way... right?

people can bitch and moan about how mean the accusation is, but it could not be any more obvious that gun nuts simply value their firearms over the lives of innocent people, no matter how many massacres happen...

Dunno. Maybe some could, and maybe others wouldn't be. What makes you happy or satisfied isn't always something rational.

I genuinely think there's something physically abnormal about the brains of people who want to get reassignment surgery, but being abnormal doesn't mean they have something pathologically wrong with them. The permanent nature of a procedure like that necessitates a thorough mental screening beforehand, which as far as I know always happens.

enough about your ancestor joseph goebbels

A lot of them do. A lot of them don't. It's their lives.

ayup. hope all is well my friend!

most proponents of gun rights are not indifferent to the loss of innocent lives, they simply disagree with the premises and conclusions under which gun opponents operate.

gun rights supporters think that social and mental issues instead of the mere availability of guns are the root cause of shootings. they think that the cases where guns saved innocent lives by being successfully used for self-defense should count against the victim numbers of shootings. and they believe that an armed society is the best protection against the rise of a tyrannical government of any kind and the loss of life such a course of events would subsequently cause.

now, I personally dont agree with all of these arguments. but what you're doing here is that you assume the other side to have the most ignorant and selfish possible reasons for their stance, and that's neither a justified nor a justifiable insinuation - and it is a thoroughly toxic and unproductive way of starting the conversation.