d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Picture Thread
Prev1322432253226322732285001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 40,833
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Sep 19 2019 06:15am
Quote (Plaguefear @ 19 Sep 2019 12:34)
Almost any leftist you see talking about socialism in a western country is talking about democratic socialism.


Maybe in America... But Americans have been gaslit so fucking hard by decades of McCarthyist rhetoric that they can't conceive of anything left of a SocDem that isn't a Stalinist.
Member
Posts: 14,319
Joined: Jun 19 2010
Gold: 7,271.48
Sep 19 2019 06:48am
Quote (GuyLadouche @ Sep 19 2019 06:10am)
i don't understand why you post this?

do you have a lot of knowledge about pigs? does the person who made tweet?

i guess we wont know if it was a good or bad idea until (if) people get sick from pork?

but i think the industry as well as the market can do a good job of regulation. Or is more government always best?



You don’t need to know anything about pigs to understand industry regulating itself isn’t a good idea.
Do you think untrained employees of the slaughterhouse should be performing these inspections?
Member
Posts: 18,848
Joined: Aug 6 2008
Gold: 8.20
Sep 19 2019 07:07am
Quote (remco6 @ Sep 19 2019 06:48am)
You don’t need to know anything about pigs to understand industry regulating itself isn’t a good idea.
Do you think untrained employees of the slaughterhouse should be performing these inspections?


… i mean to assume people who work the industry would be untrained is just an assumption.

i said the market can have an important role in regulation. If a company puts out bad product or product that's causes just a few people to get ill, well then their reputation goes down, potentially losing millions in sales. This is a strong incentive for private companies to keep inspections of product as a priority. Hence they would train employees or inspectors to do the job.

But i don't know a lot about the industry (but neither does tweeter or fender or u) and im not saying regulation is bad. But in this case, u could make an argument that the market/industry can regulate itself just fine and government intervention is no longer necessary. (in the past, yes it probably was needed, but in todays world where if a few people get sick at chipotle the news spreads across the country in a week). Maybe this is cutting government cost, unnecessary regulation, which could be a good thing.

all im saying is we don't know yet, we don't know the industry, the tweet and fender just egregiously posted is without much thought.

This post was edited by GuyLadouche on Sep 19 2019 07:07am
Member
Posts: 52,036
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
Sep 19 2019 07:35am
Quote (balrog66 @ Sep 19 2019 06:53am)
Social democracy then ;)


Capitalism is not a government.
Member
Posts: 14,319
Joined: Jun 19 2010
Gold: 7,271.48
Sep 19 2019 07:36am
Quote (GuyLadouche @ Sep 19 2019 07:07am)
… i mean to assume people who work the industry would be untrained is just an assumption.

i said the market can have an important role in regulation. If a company puts out bad product or product that's causes just a few people to get ill, well then their reputation goes down, potentially losing millions in sales. This is a strong incentive for private companies to keep inspections of product as a priority. Hence they would train employees or inspectors to do the job.

But i don't know a lot about the industry (but neither does tweeter or fender or u) and im not saying regulation is bad. But in this case, u could make an argument that the market/industry can regulate itself just fine and government intervention is no longer necessary. (in the past, yes it probably was needed, but in todays world where if a few people get sick at chipotle the news spreads across the country in a week). Maybe this is cutting government cost, unnecessary regulation, which could be a good thing.

all im saying is we don't know yet, we don't know the industry, the tweet and fender just egregiously posted is without much thought.



Did you even look into this?
A simple google search tells me these changes have already been implemented in test projects for many years so we do know how it’s going to work. Plants are using employees that have no training ( it’s optional at the discretion of the plant in the test program ) to perform inspections. The numbers of kills per hour is also increased so not every animal can be properly inspected.

It takes a special kind of stupid to believe that any industry over seeing itself is’nt going to work like closing a barn door after the all the animals are out. Third party inspections are mandatory if you actually want quality ensured. It doesn’t have to be the government, but it can’t be a party who has no power over the individual business and even worse the buidiness has power over them. This is just common sense.

Also why do you assume I know nothing about Hogs and the industry in general?
I grew up on a hog farm and I have been inside several slaughter plants , I don’t know everything, but I do know something.
Also my work in industrial construction and maintenance gives me a pretty good knowledge of the value of third party Independant inspections.

This post was edited by remco6 on Sep 19 2019 07:40am
Member
Posts: 53,538
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 11,407.33
Sep 19 2019 07:42am
Quote (GuyLadouche @ Sep 19 2019 08:10am)
i don't understand why you post this?

do you have a lot of knowledge about pigs? does the person who made tweet?

i guess we wont know if it was a good or bad idea until (if) people get sick from pork?

but i think the industry as well as the market can do a good job of regulation. Or is more government always best?


He knows worse than nothing about politics and industry.

He thinks trump bad and trump did a thing so thing is bad and so is trump.

This gets out of hand to the point that he is willing to unironically post MotherJones tweets as if they are a reputable source and not dishonest scumfucks.

Quote
Under the new rule, just announced, pork companies have a new option. They can hire their own people to help out. These company employees would be at each inspection station, weeding out any problematic pig parts before the USDA inspector gives the meat a green light. There will be fewer USDA inspectors in the plant because they won't have as much to do.

Because of the extra personnel assigned to inspections, pork companies will be allowed to run their processing plants faster.

The pork industry likes the change. "It's always great to have options!" says Gallimore.

She says that the new rules will allow plants to try out new ways of operating that could be more efficient. She says it won't affect food safety. The additional company employees will be highly trained, and USDA inspectors still will look at every piece of pork that goes into the food supply. "There's still going to be three on-line inspectors there all of the time, and there will be two 0ff-line inspectors walking around all of the time," she says.

Five big pork plants have been experimenting with this system for 20 years.
Member
Posts: 46,647
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Sep 19 2019 07:44am
Member
Posts: 18,848
Joined: Aug 6 2008
Gold: 8.20
Sep 19 2019 08:25am
Quote (remco6 @ Sep 19 2019 07:36am)
Did you even look into this?
A simple google search tells me these changes have already been implemented in test projects for many years so we do know how it’s going to work. Plants are using employees that have no training ( it’s optional at the discretion of the plant in the test program) to perform inspections. The numbers of kills per hour is also increased so not every animal can be properly inspected.

It takes a special kind of stupid to believe that any industry over seeing itself is’nt going to work like closing a barn door after the all the animals are out. Third party inspections are mandatory if you actually want quality ensured. It doesn’t have to be the government, but it can’t be a party who has no power over the individual business and even worse the buidiness has power over them. This is just common sense.


? hence why the tweet is dumb.

but you understand that in a free market, the consumer has complete power over the individual business? Like you can choose what you want to buy? And if your product is crappy, eventually the market will realize that and eliminate the company. i think this is especially true in food market.
If you get sick eating somewhere, you probably wont go back there, or buy that thing again. And that message of it being a bad product can be spread very fast by social media. (lettuce recalls, chipotle, etc etc) Do you understand this concept? Im pretty sure consumer companies understand this and would take steps to satisfy consumers needs as best they could (ie provide employees with proper training whatever that may be)

I didn't say regulation was bad, but the tweet and repost of it was made to seem like this deregulation was a bad thing. And i just thought that it was a dumb tweet/post. Consumer market works almost as a sort of regulation in this case.

You are the one who made an assumption that untrained workers would be making inspections. and for the record no i didn't look into this story at all. I can just recognize fake news and poor tweets when i see them.

This post was edited by GuyLadouche on Sep 19 2019 08:29am
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Sep 19 2019 08:36am
Canada managed to get an artist in charge, congrats.
I wish China, Us, or Russia do the same instead of shaming human specie.



This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Sep 19 2019 08:36am
Member
Posts: 104,564
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 19 2019 09:11am
















Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1322432253226322732285001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll