d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2020 > Trump Vs. Pack O' Dems
Prev13132333435983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 28,862
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Sep 5 2019 03:46pm
Quote (Skinned @ Sep 5 2019 04:14pm)
Sounds like the Taliban are still in charge there after we invaded with the goal of removing them from power.

Am I reading this wrong? Sounds like this terrorist group has a seat at the table.


This is winning to me considering troops are coming home. Less Americans in danger and more money saved considering we don't have to pay active-duty to 5k people. The sooner the other 14k soldiers come home the better.

I don't really know what to think of the Taliban but honestly i don't view them in the same light as al-qaeda or isis. They just want their own little corner of the earth without empires imposing their standards. I get that they are into stoning adulterers and marrying kids and that's bad, but after this many decades it's hard for me to see how wasting lives and tax payer dollars will solve anything
Member
Posts: 92,917
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Sep 5 2019 04:40pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Sep 5 2019 04:46pm)
This is winning to me considering troops are coming home. Less Americans in danger and more money saved considering we don't have to pay active-duty to 5k people. The sooner the other 14k soldiers come home the better.

I don't really know what to think of the Taliban but honestly i don't view them in the same light as al-qaeda or isis. They just want their own little corner of the earth without empires imposing their standards. I get that they are into stoning adulterers and marrying kids and that's bad, but after this many decades it's hard for me to see how wasting lives and tax payer dollars will solve anything


so basically "this is a win because we failed so hard for so long". on that front i agree, too many deaths over there for almost no result.
Member
Posts: 28,862
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Sep 5 2019 04:55pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Sep 5 2019 06:40pm)
so basically "this is a win because we failed so hard for so long". on that front i agree, too many deaths over there for almost no result.


This is a win because for non interventionists ending an intervention is almost always a good. This was a failure because we went in there to begin with. The 6 trillion we spent on these dumb ass wars could a. been saved, so less debt, or b. used for something useful for the average american like infrastructure.
Member
Posts: 50,718
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 4,861.00
Sep 7 2019 06:50am
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/the-washington-posts-lost-summer
https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/the-washington-posts-lost-summer/

Examiner takes the Post to task

basically one biased outlet criticizing another biased outlet, but they bring the goods in some objective facts.
It boils down to: The Post wrote a piece criticizing Trump for doing nothing all summer. The administration had provided them a list of 26 accomplishments over the summer, and the post chose to report only 4 of the bullet points on their list, and ignored the other 22, then claimed Trump had wasted his summer. But other journalists had been furnished that same list, and called out the post for their blatantly slanted reporting;
Quote
The Post could have written about the president’s directive to ease all federal student loan debt for disabled veterans. They didn’t. They could have written about the first time in history a sitting United States president walked across the DMZ into North Korea. Not a chance. They could have written about the first stage of the president’s historic trade deal with Japan, which will give our American farmers even more access to one of the largest and most promising markets. Of course not. The president even fixed dangerous immigration loopholes to increase border security and make American communities safer, but these two reporters would not deviate from their preset narrative and write about that either.


Its pretty hard to take the post's review of Trump's summer seriously when they're going to just ignore moments that kids are going to see pictured in history textbooks 30 years from now.
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Sep 7 2019 06:57am
The other side minimized what we exaggerate the importance and impact of

Is what that boiled down to

Ignoring the majority of the list altogether is lame tho especially if pushing a he did nothing narrative so the exaggerator beats the minimizer

Member
Posts: 33,921
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Sep 7 2019 07:08am
Quote (thesnipa @ Sep 5 2019 06:40pm)
so basically "this is a win because we failed so hard for so long". on that front i agree, too many deaths over there for almost no result.


Its impossible to win this kind of war because the press would interfere. If anything we should just pay china to genocide them.
Member
Posts: 50,718
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 4,861.00
Sep 7 2019 07:59am
https://reason.com/2019/09/06/no-trump-rallies-didnt-increase-hate-crimes-by-226-percent/
https://news.yahoo.com/econ-students-debunk-study-showing-212638693.html

more fake news debunked

Remember those people that claimed their study showed a 'drastic rise in hate crimes near Trump rallies'? It was even tweeted by Bernie Sanders and Ilhan Omar.
Well, it was trivial to debunk: They didn't control for population size. They compared the number of hate crimes in counties that held rallies to those that didn't, and claimed it was 226% higher. They did not count crimes per capita or otherwise control for population. They counted 3.2 million population Orange County in California as the same value as 88 population Kalawao County in Hawaii. They did not account for the fact that political rallies are obviously going to take place in counties with higher populations than average.

When these two PHDs ran the same study on Hillary Clinton rallies, they found an even larger increase in hate crimes than the original research did with Trump rallies. When they ran the same study and controlled per capita, then found no significant correlation whatsoever, no increase.
Member
Posts: 33,921
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Sep 7 2019 08:23am
Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 7 2019 09:59am)
https://reason.com/2019/09/06/no-trump-rallies-didnt-increase-hate-crimes-by-226-percent/
https://news.yahoo.com/econ-students-debunk-study-showing-212638693.html

more fake news debunked

Remember those people that claimed their study showed a 'drastic rise in hate crimes near Trump rallies'? It was even tweeted by Bernie Sanders and Ilhan Omar.
Well, it was trivial to debunk: They didn't control for population size. They compared the number of hate crimes in counties that held rallies to those that didn't, and claimed it was 226% higher. They did not count crimes per capita or otherwise control for population. They counted 3.2 million population Orange County in California as the same value as 88 population Kalawao County in Hawaii. They did not account for the fact that political rallies are obviously going to take place in counties with higher populations than average.

When these two PHDs ran the same study on Hillary Clinton rallies, they found an even larger increase in hate crimes than the original research did with Trump rallies. When they ran the same study and controlled per capita, then found no significant correlation whatsoever, no increase.


Liars shouldn't be allowed to have a voice.
Member
Posts: 13,313
Joined: May 20 2004
Gold: 253.00
Sep 7 2019 08:38am
Quote (thesnipa @ Sep 4 2019 02:23pm)
disagree. he's barked at North Koreans, whom we could beat with 20 year old tech without trying. the tech with NK has never been the issue, innocent loss of life in SK/Japan is and always will be the issue until we can credibly stop a few thousand soviet era conventional artillery missiles all fired simultaneously. which i think will be some time.

his bark at China (an actual military rival) has been economic, not militaristic.

in reality there's maybe 1 nation on earth that can even hang with year 1995 USA, China. all other nations we could take out with Top Gun era shit, even being outmatched we have 10x more and could Zerg any Protoss down.

i'm a firm believer that "we need to be cutting edge" is mostly a lie used to sell the public on insanely expensive projects. maybe some day the Chinese will attack or aliens will invade, but most of it is just an expensive dick measuring contest imo. its used to pump up job numbers.



The one advantage militarily that China has over the US is number of troops, if they tried to invade the only thing that would happen would be a lot of dead Chinese soldiers at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Sep 7 2019 10:08pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 7 2019 08:50am)
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/the-washington-posts-lost-summer
https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/the-washington-posts-lost-summer/

Examiner takes the Post to task

basically one biased outlet criticizing another biased outlet, but they bring the goods in some objective facts.
It boils down to: The Post wrote a piece criticizing Trump for doing nothing all summer. The administration had provided them a list of 26 accomplishments over the summer, and the post chose to report only 4 of the bullet points on their list, and ignored the other 22, then claimed Trump had wasted his summer. But other journalists had been furnished that same list, and called out the post for their blatantly slanted reporting;


Its pretty hard to take the post's review of Trump's summer seriously when they're going to just ignore moments that kids are going to see pictured in history textbooks 30 years from now.


Might be worth mentioning that the authors of the article are the White House press secretaries. :lol:
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev13132333435983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll