https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/the-washington-posts-lost-summerhttps://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/the-washington-posts-lost-summer/Examiner takes the Post to task
basically one biased outlet criticizing another biased outlet, but they bring the goods in some objective facts.
It boils down to: The Post wrote a piece criticizing Trump for doing nothing all summer. The administration had provided them a list of 26 accomplishments over the summer, and the post chose to report only
4 of the bullet points on their list, and ignored the other 22, then claimed Trump had wasted his summer. But other journalists had been furnished that same list, and called out the post for their blatantly slanted reporting;
Quote
The Post could have written about the president’s directive to ease all federal student loan debt for disabled veterans. They didn’t. They could have written about the first time in history a sitting United States president walked across the DMZ into North Korea. Not a chance. They could have written about the first stage of the president’s historic trade deal with Japan, which will give our American farmers even more access to one of the largest and most promising markets. Of course not. The president even fixed dangerous immigration loopholes to increase border security and make American communities safer, but these two reporters would not deviate from their preset narrative and write about that either.
Its pretty hard to take the post's review of Trump's summer seriously when they're going to just ignore moments that kids are going to see pictured in history textbooks 30 years from now.