Quote (Leevee @ Mar 25 2019 09:36am)
What I meant is, those people who say "Oh god I want to read the report" are the same type of people who respond with "Source please!" every time they see a statement they disagree with.
heh my bad. the joke was so accurate i thought it was an every day reply lol.
there's nothing wrong with asking for sources, but many here truly don't care. they are just hoping you can't source it, cause they refuse to read it.
Quote (IceMage @ Mar 25 2019 09:40am)
Congress has been battling DOJ for two years trying to get information on the Hillary email investigation and Russiagate. Democrats are going to pick up that fight... and Republicans may do so also in an attempt to smear the investigators.
Standard DOJ practice is to not smear unindicted people, but there's always exceptions.
congress...
ok. the report has to be sent to the white house team first for redactions of non-criminal parties and/or activities. this is law.
if you have good reason for an investigation into the investigation... you call the IG horowitz. like we did 2 years ago.
https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/downloadwe had very good reason for that though. which is why graham is going to start really diving into it now with the mueller investigation over.
again. mueller did completely exonerate trump and everyone associated to him of conspiring and/or coordinating with russia. instead, refusing the help offered to them.
so the only thing you are asking for now to pin trump... is the obstruction of justice.
why do you strongly believe that the AG would be wrong about not charging him? edit: AG and DAG
This post was edited by tagged4nothing on Mar 25 2019 04:39pm