Quote (gnarjay @ 15 Feb 2024 16:16)
explain to me how a mayor or any other city leader can affect gun crime if their state has lax or no gun control laws
Um, cities have their own gun control laws. Weren't you aware?
Edit: Also, if we're being fair, using "Gun Control Laws" as a measure isn't really a thing either.
Take Oregon for example. Legal age to purchase a firearm is still 18. You can't buy smokes or vapes or booze or pot until 21. Firearms? 18. Even in the Portland area, gunshops are EVERYWHERE. Like, I knew fewer people who were NOT armed than people who were. Whether it was in small town (southern) Oregon, or smack dab in the middle of the big city. Everyone was armed. Yet until 2016, it was one of the safest cities and safest states in the entire nation, from a violent crime perspective. Murders could be counted without even taking off your shoes. BLM riots and Antifa riots have changed the picture in Portland itself, yet even today it's STILL far safer than cities with the most oppressive gun control measures in the nation, such as DC or Chicago or Baltimore or just take your pick.
Oregon is hard blue. Blue governor, blue senators, blue mayors in Eugene/Springfield, Salem, Portland, and the majority of the Portland suburbs.
Turns out, you don't really need gun control. It's something else that kept violent crime down. Any ideas?
Edit 2: Oregon has also ALWAYS had open carry. Wander into a walmart, you'll see 20% of the customers strapped. Nobody blinks. Concealed carry still requires a permit, last I checked. And seeing pickups with gun racks is the norm, not the exception. When I say "Everyone is armed" I mean it.
This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Feb 15 2024 05:33pm