Quote (Crunkt @ 19 Nov 2021 09:15)
thanks for the update broski
Quite welcome.

Quote (Doggyfood @ 19 Nov 2021 09:14)
The jury is probably conflicted on how to apply self-defense laws for someone who planned out his self-defense ahead of time and made a special trip to go do it.
This is an interesting assertion. The fact chain presented in the trial, and not argued against by the prosecution is that Kyle works in Kenosha, has 3 family members (father, grandmother, and aunt) who live in Kenosha, Dominick Black, his best friend lives in Kenosha. He worked in Kenosha the prior day, stayed at Dominck Black's house the prior night. Their friend asked if they wanted to come help protect the Carsource lots that day, they said sure, and Kyle took his medkit with him to provide aid, and indeed DID provide aid to the very rioters you claim he was "planning against".
Every single fact in this case needs to be taken from the trial. I don't know which Lemon or Maddow you're listening to, but based on the facts presented in the trial, what you're saying is false. According to the evidence in the case, Rittenhouse was a member of the Kenosha community, was there on a daily basis for work, had a pattern of providing basic aid to protestors, and had every right to carry the rifle he was carrying, should self defense become necessary, the exact same as anyone else.

Quote (Crunkt @ 19 Nov 2021 09:15)
thttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tAa7n2rvFU
That video is useless and you should feel stupid for continuing to spam it. Private conversations among friends watching businesses being looted, vandalized, and burned down from prior days are neither admissible nor relevant. The prosecution attempted to submit that video and the court denied it for the reasons listed.
Grow up, kiddo.
This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Nov 19 2021 11:23am