Din do niffin
We wuz kangz
That raysis

The intent was clearly a citizens arrest, not violence.

Are you 8 years old?

Yes, clearly. Now lets see how that holds up in court.

"Additionally, they had the defendants' own words to investigators read aloud in court, in which they said they did not see Arbery before he ran past their driveways and did not know what he had been doing before.

McMichael also said he shouted out a graphic threat mid-chase that he would shoot Arbery's head off if he did not stop."

Good old citizens arrest, not violence

"im going to fucking shoot your head off"

This post was edited by SBD on Nov 19 2021 10:23am

Double post.

This post was edited by SBD on Nov 19 2021 10:23am

The thread you're looking for is located here: https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=90084157&f=119

To the non-spammers: Any bets on whether or not there'll be a verdict one way or another today?

Thanks, ill continue to post here as long as people post twitter references to Arberys case and try to pass it off as this case so that it fits their narrative better.

First, the tweet was ambiguous and did not specify which trial it was referring to. Second, that was post 3152. Your post is 3176. You've responded. People have not "continued posting twitter references" about other trials outside of responses to your own posts.

Stop spamming here. This topic is about the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial, which is currently live, with jury in deliberation. Go discuss the other case in the thread created for it.



Same goes to you. The thread you're looking for is located here: https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=90084157&f=119

Or take your little spat to PM. The trials are unrelated, the fact patterns are unrelated, you are in the wrong topic.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Nov 19 2021 10:30am

If that shouted claim isnt fake news, then this becomes negligent manslaughter bare minimum.

The conversation continued. If you don't like it dont read it.

the conversation is continuing in this thread.

This post was edited by SBD on Nov 19 2021 10:30am

A couple questions I have in this case:

1. There's a claim by the prosecution that Kyle pointed his rifle at the Zaminskis, establishing provocation. However, pointing a weapon at another person is called Brandishing, and is a crime. Why is there no Brandishing charge? Affirmative fact needs to be established to prevent reasonable doubt.

2. Grosskreutz admitted, under oath, that he pointed his firearm at Kyle Rittenhouse prior to Kyle shooting at him. Provocation of any sort directed at Grosskreutz has not been established in any way. Why has Grosskreutz not been charged with Brandishing?

Edit: Question 2 fixed. Sorry, still early yet.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Nov 19 2021 10:41am