What's hypocritical about it at all? Explain it to me like I'm 3 years old. Use your words.

Suuuure, best guy you got there. Congratulations

/e oh lol, some triggered turd reported it instantly !

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Aug 19 2019 07:38am

Whoever made that last article is delusional lol. Women cheat because they aren't satisfied. Sure, this may save your marriage if you are okay with your wife getting her sexual and emotional support from a third party. I don't think so.

In the end though, relationships have two adults. You gotta communicate and be open with each other about your needs and wants before it gets to this stage.

This post was edited by ChrisKz on Aug 19 2019 07:40am

People either need to stick with the traditional marriage idea, or move on to a new system. Maybe a 10 year contract marriage, which can be renewed after 10 years or either party can bow out of, with no repercussions, or something.

In other words, you've got nothing.

Nah, we shouldn't even call it traditional marriage. It should be just marriage, and people can sort it out themselves. The problem is that humans are meant to be monogamous and faithful to their mates, but when they view flings as outside of 'mating' and their 'household' they slip, often.

There is also the instinct to take care of yourself and your offspring, so if either the man or woman in the marriage isn't carrying their own weight or not taking care of their kids, the other partner is likely to look for a better mate.

This is just being human. Trying to look at it any other way and you start going into the subjective area. People would argue that emotions are subjective, but in my opinion they are something you feel, and discrediting it as something subjective is stupid. Imo emotions are objective, and they are part of the whole.

This post was edited by ChrisKz on Aug 19 2019 08:17am

People feel that emotions are up for subjective interpretation because not everybody feel sthe same way in every situation. I know this sort of thing is probably beyond your ability to comprehend.

Not an objective statement.

A lot of research supports it, and almost all data/research, or inquiries, that I've seen arguing against were full of questionnaires and study pools that specifically supported their argument, rather than an analysis of a population. Considering that almost all populations around the world of modern times, and even most of the cases in ancient times( other than harems of wealthy or highly statured individuals), would evidence towards that statement being objective.

Just because you feel (see where I'm going here) otherwise, the logic is there.

This post was edited by ChrisKz on Aug 19 2019 08:31am