Quote (fender @ Jul 29 2019 09:58am)
"hey, i got some of the crumbs of the rich people's cake that blew a massive hole into the budget, that later generations will have to deal with! this anecdotal evidence clearly proves the cake was a good thing. also, as long as you don't literally die multiple times as a direct consequence of a specific policy, the person responsible can't be a shitty president whose main concerns are enriching himself and his millionaire buddies. i am very intelligent!"
____________________________________________________________________________
who wins from securing the financial markets and have the incredibly profitable fossil fuel industry do the bare minimum to protect the environment? so difficult to figure out, i guess it has to be no one.
the 'crippling regulation' talking point is just that, it's propaganda, an idea that has been mercilessly pushed on people too stupid or too loyal to critically think about it - just like the 'unregulated immigration' narrative. it was never the case, and no one actually supported it.
lolwut
Quote
DIAZ-BALART: We had a very spirited debate on this stage last night on the topic of decriminalization of the border. If–if you would be so kind raise your hand if you think it should be a civil offense rather than a crime to cross the border without documentation? Can we keep the hands up so we can see them?
only a few kept their hands down. the majority of the 2020 candidates support decriminalizing undocumented border crossing.
any line you put between decriminalization and open borders is semantic and spurious.
the idea that an immigrant can enter the country, receive a ticket for civil forfeiture, and then be released into the country is "Open borders" in political rhetoric. the literal idea of open borders is afaik not existent anywhere on earth, and is clearly not what the rhetoric points to.