Quote (Black XistenZ @ 8 Aug 2019 19:09)
If a majority of americans really wants stricter gun regulation, it should be no problem to fund a gun-control counterpart to the NRA, a lobby group which is even richer and more powerful.
Politically, the true obstacle for sweeping limitations on gun rights isnt Trump anyway, it's the Senate with its large, inherent bias in favor of rural states. (Among all policy issues, gun control is among those with THE largest urban-rural splits.)
IF? have you seen any polls in the last couple of years?!
and no, not only is it the wrong approach to fight corruption with even more corruption, and directly opposed to the 'get money OUT of politics' stance that most americans favour, it'd also not be as simple as you dishonestly try to make it sound. established structures and ties through decades of lobbying can't be matched that easily. and again, completely wrong approach to begin with.
Quote (Beowulf @ 8 Aug 2019 19:09)
Dunno why anti gun people push the weak NRA talking point all the time
Are they also telling me what to think as a non gun owning non gun interested second amendment supporting leftist that has never had anything to do with the NRA?
I support the right to own for lots of reason I don't even stick with one. Hunting, defense, bluff stick, ranch hand, whatever people wanna do with them that is within their rights
NRA doesn't control people. Only city TYT type of anti gun people buy into that nonsense
fair enough, you may not have any ties to them, but you sure as hell use a whole lot of their anti-intellectual and lazy talking points ('don't politicise this' / 'guns protect minorities'...). i guess when you grow up in that 'culture' and don't have a reason to critically question those, you just absorb them...