Jordan Peterson would have never been allowed to leave

translation: I know you asked me to find a topic republicans care more about and campaign on more but i cant, and i wont admit it.





just more proof that whenever someone needs to be a hard right trump supporting republican he interprets all posts that way for convenience. you clearly were saying "now it's a problem", implying that the dems only see it as a problem when used against them. the context couldnt be more clear. BUT, if you're NOT a card carrying GOP trump supporter he has no point, so he just keeps swinging at a nail that isnt there paying no mind to the flying wood chips.

this is honestly about 50% of his "conversations". the person just takes a perspective on what both sides are doing and Fender assumes it's a biased perspective instead and that everyone is a party preservationist who only wants to score points for their side. in short, he's incapable due to both a cripple intellect and wholly biased viewpoint of meta analysis. "in too deep" would be fitting, but i'd add "also cant swim".

it's funny how every time you get schooled, you write up some off-topic essay fantasising about me, and trying to create a little circle jerk with someone who also happened to disagree with me as a crutch. as predictable as it is pathetic.

here's more prove of republicans not caring about public opinion, and suggesting to do the least amount they can get away with, so their donors don't get too mad:
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/07/poll-most-voters-support-assault-weapons-ban-1452586

Writes about schooling thesnipa, describes him as fantasising.

Cannot make this shit up.

Lol, poll conducted in the immediate aftermath of the shootings. Meanwhile, baseline support for a new AWB is firmly opposed, as previously posted.

caught lying again...





btw, every poll in america happens in the aftermath of a shooting, such is the prevalence of those events...

This post was edited by fender on Aug 8 2019 08:02am

No, you just can't read. I clearly pointed out that your survey was taken in the immediate aftermath of the shootings.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/196658/support-assault-weapons-ban-record-low.aspx

on top of that, i say he's incapable of meta analysis. then i analyze his posting style from a meta standpoint and it's called a fantasy.

you really can't even dream up this kind of lack of self awareness until you're exposed to it for a chunk of time.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Aug 8 2019 08:03am

cmon they should allow full auto mininukes

you're just mad that you still can't see base camp of mount equivalence, so you resort to pure ad hom posts, trying to find allies who got equally exposed.



it is you who failed reading comprehension, BOTH of the polls i posted there were conducted BEFORE the shootings (one in march, the other one in july) - yours is from 2016.
last time i checked, this is 2019 - so which one do you figure is more accurate, liar?

This post was edited by fender on Aug 8 2019 08:12am

you accused me of being vague when in fact i chose the 3 most popular (imo) issues for the GOP rhetoric. then you admitted i'm right on one, and you boiled the other 2 down to Trump (invalidating your point about the GOP generally). Then Santara rightly jammed you up on the history of Gerrymandering and how you've got blinders on. and you responded by saying he's pro gerrymandering because he only wants the GOP to win and that he is desperate to support President Trump.

you got messed up pretty good. tbh