Quote (FantasyWorldII @ Aug 30 2022 01:29am)
evidently not because you believe earth it what? 5000 years old? :bonk:
I have never made that argument. what your doing is called a strawman. It is a logical fallacy. Its an admission on your part that you have lost the argument.
Quote (ferdia @ Aug 30 2022 04:36am)
afaik its estimated the earth is 4.5 billion years of age. to my mind thats proof that god is either lazy (before he got around to creating mankind), or does not exist.
everyone is free to their own opinions and beliefs and its normal in backward societies around the world to believe in otherworldly deities. and yes, by this i mean all societies are still backwards. While this can be considered a failing of our species I would not deem it a failure of society but rather a product of our current level of mental strength / comprehension.
to make things simple. to date the place first you would have to know the original conditions of what your dating. assumptions are made to get that date. In other word "they making chit up". what I am saying it the age of the place in unknowable.
then the big pain come with simulation hypothesis and that is from the institution of science. how quickly the super duper "scientific" atheist/antitheists dismiss science and reason when it conflicts with their woo woo religion. what I am saying is atheists/antitheists are the biggest woo woo religious nutters there is.
Quote (lodd222 @ Aug 30 2022 08:01am)
you're quoting a script as a rebuttle that replaces your own autonomy. the bible would call what you just did "dead via a dead letter" rather than a living personal testimony.
you are both alike, unbelievers.
check this out, you ever seen anything like it?
Zombie Bugs. Dead, but Animated by Fungus
https://www.bitchute.com/video/NEhjzTeKT7Vq/