Quote (bogie160 @ 26 May 2022 14:03)
As I just said, you're mixing and matching administrations and decades to match a narrative. Crack vs powder sentencing was a Reagan phenomenon, so how does this relate to Ehrlichman's singular quote regarding a Nixon administration that ended in 1974?
Besides, the impact of crack cocaine vs powder on the body is obvious to anyone familiar with the drug. Crack cocaine's shorter, more intense high makes it worse, both for the user and society, than the impact of snorting coke. It makes sense that these would be treated differently in the eyes of the law.
With respect to incarceration rates, take the first two countries on your list. The rate of intentional homicide in the United States versus the United Kingdom is almost directly proportional to the rate of incarceration in both countries. Should the United States release more murderers? Most people at this point recognize that the war on drugs was not successful, and there is a bipartisan push to correct the impact. But that is one part of the picture. The United States has a lot more crime. Turning criminals back onto the street has failed, look at Minneapolis, NYC, and San Francisco. Left-wing voters in these places are revolting against radical DAs that have had a disastrous impact on public safety.
you're literally just regurgitating the facts i presented to YOU, hilariously acting like you're the one who came up with them, while dishonestly suggesting the widely criticised sentencing disparity, the obvious and self-admitted racial element, the failed and devastating impact of the war on drugs wasn't something that historians, legal, and medical experts overwhelmingly agreed on.
also, did you have to make it THAT obvious that you never even learned the very basics of statistics? that relation between overall prison population per capita and homicide rates would only be relevant to this discussion if we were exclusively looking at incarcerations for homicides. my point, however, is that the insane percentage of incarcerated US citizens is due to non-violent, low level offences. everyone agrees a murderer deserves to be locked up, but that's not at all the point here.
you're really trying your best to deflect from the main point here: your government implemented insanely oppressive policies that lead to large swathes of your population behind bars, and guns did nothing to prevent that. just like they did nothing to prevent the US' decline into oligarchy, massive surveillance programs by the government, or your leaders repeatedly starting wars that allegedly no one supports. the whole "we need guns to protect our freedom" narrative is bullshit. comprehensively debunked by history and facts. you can shill for the failed war on drugs all you want, that doesn't change it.