d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Senate Impeachment Trial 2020
Prev13031323334134Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 26,025
Joined: Jun 14 2006
Gold: 5,300.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 26 2020 12:26pm
Quote (theCrossbones @ Jan 26 2020 01:24pm)

you're gonna have to get a bit more specific than that. you expect me to read a link full of links to try to find "your" point?
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Jan 26 2020 12:28pm
Quote (tagged4nothing @ Jan 26 2020 10:18am)
let the record show the bold statement.

this statement is assuming the house is above law and precedent. a branch not equal to another, but with far more power over the others.
this completely ignores checks and balances


No I am saying that in the house it is a political or otherwise driven process. The Senate is the one that is required to show legal and non partial judgement. Moscow Mitch has already proven he doesn't care about the constitution.
IE 1--Levels basic line of proof and charges 2-- the other has formal trial and proves disproves the charges. Pretty simple. The Senate is the one that has more POWER and is required to do this correctly. The house has more members per capita to be more directly responsive to the peoples "feelings" Senate is supposed to be by the "books"
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Jan 26 2020 12:30pm
Quote (tagged4nothing @ Jan 26 2020 10:26am)
you're gonna have to get a bit more specific than that. you expect me to read a link full of links to try to find "your" point?


No thanks if your not interested as most of the people on here why bother. I never get into facts as not one of you will listen to them.. IE wall of texts are a waste. short insults much more productive.
Member
Posts: 26,025
Joined: Jun 14 2006
Gold: 5,300.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 26 2020 12:32pm
Quote (theCrossbones @ Jan 26 2020 01:28pm)
No I am saying that in the house it is a political or otherwise driven process. The Senate is the one that is required to show legal and non partial judgement. Moscow Mitch has already proven he doesn't care about the constitution.
IE 1--Levels basic line of proof and charges 2-- the other has formal trial and proves disproves the charges. Pretty simple. The Senate is the one that has more POWER and is required to do this correctly. The house has more members per capita to be more directly responsive to the peoples "feelings" Senate is supposed to be by the "books"


this doesn't support your prior statement.
Quote (theCrossbones @ Jan 26 2020 01:12pm)
LOL perfect the House is not required to follow due process that is a legal term the house is political opinion *read about it. You are literally asking the house to do something it constitutionally has no obligation to do but are ok with the Senate doing EXACTLY what you are bitching about. and THEY are obligated by the constitution.
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL


Quote (theCrossbones @ Jan 26 2020 01:30pm)
No thanks if your not interested as most of the people on here why bother. I never get into facts as not one of you will listen to them.. IE wall of texts are a waste. short insults much more productive.

or you're just unaware of what facts are
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Jan 26 2020 12:35pm
Quote (tagged4nothing @ Jan 26 2020 10:32am)
this doesn't support your prior statement.


how does it not?
I shared the facts with you.. Its too much for you to read.

:cry:

This post was edited by theCrossbones on Jan 26 2020 12:36pm
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Jan 26 2020 12:36pm
Quote (tagged4nothing @ Jan 26 2020 10:32am)
this doesn't support your prior statement.



or you're just unaware of what facts are


1. How does it not?
2. I shared them with you and its "too much reading for you"

Literally the first paragraph.

If a federal official commits a crime or otherwise acts improperly, the House of Representatives may impeach—formally charge—that official. If the official subsequently is convicted in a Senate impeachment trial, he is removed from office.

This post was edited by theCrossbones on Jan 26 2020 12:38pm
Member
Posts: 26,025
Joined: Jun 14 2006
Gold: 5,300.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 26 2020 12:38pm
Quote (theCrossbones @ Jan 26 2020 01:36pm)
1. How does it not?
2. I shared them with you and its "too much reading for you"

Literally the first paragraph.

If a federal official commits a crime or otherwise acts improperly, the House of Representatives may impeach—formally charge—that official. If the official subsequently is convicted in a Senate impeachment trial, he is removed from office.

this does not in any way suggest that the House is granted authority above law and precedent.

Quote (theCrossbones @ Jan 26 2020 01:30pm)
No thanks if your not interested as most of the people on here why bother.I never get into facts as not one of you will listen to them.. IE wall of texts are a waste. short insults much more productive.

you shared a link "full" of links. you literally linked a glossary.

This post was edited by tagged4nothing on Jan 26 2020 12:41pm
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Jan 26 2020 12:40pm
Quote (tagged4nothing @ Jan 26 2020 10:38am)
you shared a link "full" of links. you literally linked a glossary.


Yes im stating that I don't share these things *this being an exception because nobody here has an open mind and has proven these deep dives to be too much.
Slander and insults are much more satisfying here. And you proved it by not even being able to read the first paragraph
Member
Posts: 26,025
Joined: Jun 14 2006
Gold: 5,300.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 26 2020 12:42pm
Quote (theCrossbones @ Jan 26 2020 01:40pm)
Yes im stating that I don't share these things *this being an exception because nobody here has an open mind and has proven these deep dives to be too much.
Slander and insults are much more satisfying here. And you proved it by not even being able to read the first paragraph


you apparently missed the edit so i'll repeat it.
this does not in any way suggest that the House is granted authority above law and precedent.

remember those phrases from Nancy and Schiff and Schumer?

"no one is above the law"

This post was edited by tagged4nothing on Jan 26 2020 12:43pm
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Jan 26 2020 12:50pm
Quote (tagged4nothing @ Jan 26 2020 10:42am)
you apparently missed the edit so i'll repeat it.
this does not in any way suggest that the House is granted authority above law and precedent.

remember those phrases from Nancy and Schiff and Schumer?

"no one is above the law"


ok.. lets do this backwards.
What law did the House break

remember those phrases from Nancy and Schiff and Schumer?

"no one is above the law"
For the record you now care what Pelosi and Schiff, Schumer say?
Noted for the record.

This post was edited by theCrossbones on Jan 26 2020 12:51pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev13031323334134Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll