Quote (bogie160 @ 6 Jan 2020 21:44)
I've spent more time on this subject than you have. I've had better teachers. I was born with a higher ceiling.
not gonna lie, that was pretty funny. let me guess: you graduated top of your class in the navy seals, have been involved in numerous secret raids on al-quaeda, and have over 9,000 confirmed kills. you're trained in 'gorilla warfare' and you're the top sniper in the entire us armed forces, prepared to wipe me out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before?
Quote (bogie160 @ 6 Jan 2020 21:44)
I've spent more time on this subject than you have. I've had better teachers. I was born with a higher ceiling. I can be condescending too.
There is a world of difference between regurgitating cleric talking points and expressing concern that this represents an escalation while acknowledging the clear provocation Iran provided.
When you sit here and argue (in this thread) that there is "no evidence" that Iran was the perpetrator of the 2019 tanker attacks, it's important that you recognize that you belong to a small minority that mostly includes Iranian proxies and propagandists.
reality is, you're a delusional dunce, uncritically regurgitating warmonger propaganda and moronic right wing talking points. you successfully deluded yourself into thinking your ignorant take on the iran deal was actually a popular one, completely oblivious to the reality of how the rest of the world thinks about it.