Quote (Black XistenZ @ 26 Aug 2018 22:14)
Trump only won Texas by 9% in 2016, but I guess he also was rather unpopular. But then again, Romney defeated Obama by "just" 16% in 2012. Even back in 2000, in a neutral national environment, Bush won his home state of Texas by "only" 22%. Subtract the home state factor, and it was only R+16 or so even back then. And due to heavy latino immigration and internal migration into the big cities, Texas has probably become more purple since then.
True, good point. Your 12-16 point range is probably correct.
There are talks about Texas becoming purple, but I think we are pretty far from that. There is an increasing Hispanic population in this state, but a sizeable amount of them are actually Conservative. 34% of Texas Hispanics voted for Trump, and it's not uncommon for Republicans in this state to get 40-50%+ from Hispanics when the candidate isn't as abrasive with their community as Trump.
But not only do the margins leave something to be desired for Democrats, Hispanics also participate in elections less than Whites and Blacks. There's also low voter turnout in Texas in general, which disproportionately hurts Democrats. Lastly, Republicans have also had a vicegrip on the state on the local, state, and federal levels for decades, which can't be discounted.
All this to say that I think the talks of Texas turning purple are a little premature. It certainly is trending that way, but it probably won't be in true contention until at least another two decades by my estimates.