Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Sep 7 2022 11:06pm)
He votes both federally and locally, often for programs that implicitly benefit those who were underserved previously and allows that to propagate to today. Maybe he works at a bank and still participates in pseudo-redlining, making it harder for certain zip codes to get home loans. Maybe he's an appraiser and appraises black people's homes lower than white people's. Maybe he votes based on NIMBY ideals and keeps felons in prison and keeps low income housing away from his area. This creates a system where one group has, on average, an easier to navigating the system. The examples I gave actually happen and ripple out from everywhere. As if financial systems in New York don't ripple out to the banking system nation-wide.
Here's where you go "ha ha but they're so far away" as if that matters and this isn't a system-wide issue. Which is just going to show your own unwillingness to understand the issue because we've been over this many times before and I know you are ideologically opposed to ever acknowledging structural issues related to race if it isn't part of a Republican talking point.
I asked a pretty simple question.
Quote (bogie160 @ Sep 7 2022 11:00pm)
As a case study, take a poor white in rural Alabama, and a rich white who grew up in the North-East and works in IT or finance. To what extent do you think the IT or financial professional leverages their individual power to the benefit of the rural Alabaman?