d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1304530463047304830493169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 46,653
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Jul 2 2019 10:41pm
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7199795/Lion-London-Bridge-faced-terrorists-anti-terror-list-far-right-yobs-contact-him.html

The 'Lion of London Bridge' who was hailed a hero for fighting off knife-wielding jihadis during the terror attack said he is on an anti-terror watch list after being contacted by far-right anti-Islam supporters.
Roy Larner, 49, screamed, 'f*** you, I'm Millwall,' as he took on the knife murderers when they struck in June 2017 while he was enjoying a pint in the Black & Blue restaurant in Borough Market, in Southwark, south-east London.
But Mr Larner has since been placed on the Government's Prevent programme over fears that he could become an extremist after he was contacted by far-right yobs.

He has had to attend de-radicalisation classes and police are monitoring him, the Sun reported.
Mr Larner said: 'They treat me like a terrorist but I'm not political at all.
The 49-year-old required surgery after being slashed multiple times in the head and neck by Rachid Redouane and Yousseff Zaghba, who - along with third terrorist Khuram Butt - ended up killing eight and injuring 38 others.

He was released from hospital 12 days after the attack which left him with more than 80 stitches to his head, ear, arms and hands.
While in hospital, he was pictured propping himself up in bed with a 'learn to run' manual his friends had given him - which they said displayed 'our south-east London sense of humour'.
Mr Larner said one of the attackers had shouted, 'This is for Allah,' and 'Islam, Islam, Islam,' when they struck.
Even after being repeatedly stabbed and falling to the floor, CCTV footage showed Mr Larner raising his fists in defence.

The Millwall fan was a hailed a hero after the attacks, with some even calling for him to be George Cross, the highest civilian award for gallantry.
However, in July 2017, footage from February of that year emerged of him spitting on a black photographer and ranting about 'foreign c****s who 'stink like s***t'.
He escaped jail after being handed a suspended sentence and a £50 fine.
Later, in September 2018, he was charged after being found with the powerful and potentially deadly painkiller fentanyl - the drug linked to the death of popstar Prince.
A Home Office spokesman told MailOnline: 'Prevent safeguards people who may be vulnerable to being drawn into terrorism. It is entirely up to an individual whether they accept the support offered through Prevent.
'The support people receive through Prevent is rightly confidential and it would not be appropriate to comment on whether or not an individual has been offered support.'
Member
Posts: 46,653
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Jul 3 2019 12:04am
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ice-issuing-fines-immigrants-sanctuary-churches/story?id=64094018&cid=clicksource_77_null_headlines_hed

An example of our very functional and working-as-intended immigration enforcement.
A mexican woman hops the border and enters the country illegally. She stays here and has two children who become US citizens by birth. She tries to apply for asylum or refugee status, but is denied after going through the lengthy process because she has no valid claim at all. After receiving due process on her civil offense of illegal entry, again a length proceeding, she gets ordered deported by a judge, told to voluntarily leave. She refuses to comply and instead takes sanctuary inside a church, where she continues to live for 2 years now, knowing ICE will not raid a church even if its legal for them to do so. So with a removal order still pending, she lives safely inside Columbus Mennonite Church, receiving support from pro-illegal alien volunteer groups and the church. Now the administration has finally started to enforce "8 USC 1324d: Civil penalties for failure to depart" and has issued her a $799 per day civil fine for 623 days of willfully refusing to depart the US, make good faith preparations to depart or present herself for removal. Resulting in a $497,777 fine. Which of course, she will not pay, and ICE will be unable to enforce it without actually raiding the church. Though perhaps it lays the groundwork for having her removed by police for failure to pay the fine, then seized by ICE. Of course, just like how ICE refuses to raid the church even thoguh they can, the statute permits them to fine the church an equal half a million bucks for conspiring to shelter her, but they decline to do so.
Member
Posts: 52,257
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Jul 3 2019 04:24am
Quote (Goomshill @ 3 Jul 2019 08:04)
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ice-issuing-fines-immigrants-sanctuary-churches/story?id=64094018&cid=clicksource_77_null_headlines_hed

An example of our very functional and working-as-intended immigration enforcement.
A mexican woman hops the border and enters the country illegally. She stays here and has two children who become US citizens by birth. She tries to apply for asylum or refugee status, but is denied after going through the lengthy process because she has no valid claim at all. After receiving due process on her civil offense of illegal entry, again a length proceeding, she gets ordered deported by a judge, told to voluntarily leave. She refuses to comply and instead takes sanctuary inside a church, where she continues to live for 2 years now, knowing ICE will not raid a church even if its legal for them to do so. So with a removal order still pending, she lives safely inside Columbus Mennonite Church, receiving support from pro-illegal alien volunteer groups and the church. Now the administration has finally started to enforce "8 USC 1324d: Civil penalties for failure to depart" and has issued her a $799 per day civil fine for 623 days of willfully refusing to depart the US, make good faith preparations to depart or present herself for removal. Resulting in a $497,777 fine. Which of course, she will not pay, and ICE will be unable to enforce it without actually raiding the church. Though perhaps it lays the groundwork for having her removed by police for failure to pay the fine, then seized by ICE. Of course, just like how ICE refuses to raid the church even thoguh they can, the statute permits them to fine the church an equal half a million bucks for conspiring to shelter her, but they decline to do so.


The optics of raiding or just fining a church would be too bad, so it's logical that they dont do that. It would carry the risk of splitting the religious right over this issue, which would be a cataclysmic disaster for Trump and Republicans.
They could and should, however, fine the shit out of self-proclaimed sanctuary cities, which tend to be deep 'blue' and unpopular with the GOP voters anyway.
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,296.75
Jul 3 2019 09:06am


Member
Posts: 48,827
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
Jul 3 2019 09:09am
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,296.75
Jul 3 2019 09:58am
Member
Posts: 48,827
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
Jul 3 2019 10:26am
Quote (Beowulf @ Jul 3 2019 10:58am)


Trump is technically correct. Because he'll be president for life, he's referring to the 2030 census.
Member
Posts: 15,467
Joined: Sep 15 2007
Gold: 475.46
Jul 3 2019 12:51pm
Trump, the blithering idiot. Cant wait for 2020.
Member
Posts: 48,827
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
Jul 3 2019 12:54pm
Quote (Brian_D @ Jul 3 2019 01:51pm)
Trump, the blithering idiot. Cant wait for 2020.


So you can watch him win again?
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 285.00
Jul 3 2019 02:13pm
Quote (IceMage @ Jul 3 2019 01:54pm)
So you can watch him win again?


They re elected Bush they will reelect him.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1304530463047304830493169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll