https://www.foxnews.com/us/medic-testifies-that-he-not-navy-seal-eddie-gallagher-was-responsible-for-isis-fighters-death>prosecutors give a SEAL team medic immunity so he can testify that Eddie Gallagher killed the ISIS militant
>he gives his testimony as the prosecutors wanted it
>goes to cross examination
>under cross, says that
he is the one who killed the militant>now he's got both immunity and isn't treated as a hostile witness since he already testified against gallagher
>testifies that the prosecution didn't actually ask him the cause of death, and that the cause of death was him, the medic, purposefully asphyxiating the militant by covering his breathing tube until he suffocated
>but does testify that the militant would have died anyway, and he was mercy killing him
Is this where we take new information and try to use it to justify something stupid Trump wanted to do weeks ago?